Should employers ban office romances in light of the Me Too movement?

-

Office romance

It is almost inevitable, with the number of hours that people spend at work and the growing social opportunities on offer, that romantic relationships will occur between colleagues. Because this can blur the lines on professionalism at work, some employers may be concerned about the effect that these relationships can have on the workplace in light of the Me Too movement. This movement, in which a great number of women have come forward claiming to have been sexually harassed within a professional environment, originated in October 2017 when Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein was accused of using his position to sexually abuse women.

Legally, there are no laws preventing office romances and it is usually left to employers to determine how they are going to respond to them. However, although it may be tempting for employers to implement a complete office ban on romances, or ‘love contract’, this rule can be very unpopular among the workforce, highly difficult to enforce and potentially breach the human rights of the employees. It is therefore advisable for an employer to outline within their company policies what is considered appropriate behaviour in their workplace and place a requirement upon any individuals entering into a relationship to disclose this to their manager. From there, employers can decide if the individuals should work separately in order to avoid any potential conflicts of interest within ongoing projects or general working duties. This can also help to avoid accusations of preferential treatment from other members of staff if the relationship involves a manager and someone on their team.

Employers may also be concerned about what the implications could be if the relationship turns sour, which could expose the company to increased liability such as accusations of sexual harassment and discrimination. It is therefore highly advisable that clear policies are maintained that outline a zero tolerance policy to this kind of treatment within the workplace and that both parties to the relationship are reminded of this fact when they disclose it. If either individual is found to be operating in breach of this, employers should process the situation through their usual disciplinary and misconduct procedures.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In order to help to clearly outline the company’s stance on this issue, employers should aim to maintain an open, supportive and approachable culture that strongly encourages those considering entering into a relationship to come forward. This could be done by discussing the procedure for workplace relationships within inductions, ongoing company training or meetings. A proactive and strong approach to this may help in discouraging employees from keeping their relationship a secret, meaning that the employer can take steps to counteract any potential issues that could arise at an early stage. It could also mean that employees feel able to come forward if the relationship does end and the conduct of the other individual is causing them to feel uncomfortable at work, meaning the employers will be able to take action against that person before the situation escalates.

Kate Palmer is HR Advice and Consultancy Director at global employment law consultancy, Peninsula.
Kate joined in 2009 from a worldwide facility services company where she was Senior HR Manager. Her exploits included providing HR & employment law support to over 30 UK hospitals and dealing with high profile NHS union cases—expertise she now brings to Peninsula clients.
Today, Kate is involved in all aspects of HR and employment law advice.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Paul Russell: Soft skills – 8 focus areas for happier employees

If we want to keep our best people happy, then we need to think beyond the payroll and the purse. We need to think about hearts and minds.

Nicholas Roi: Engaging a geographically dispersed workforce

As remote working is on the rise, more businesses...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you