HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Should employers ban office romances in light of the Me Too movement?

-

Office romance

It is almost inevitable, with the number of hours that people spend at work and the growing social opportunities on offer, that romantic relationships will occur between colleagues. Because this can blur the lines on professionalism at work, some employers may be concerned about the effect that these relationships can have on the workplace in light of the Me Too movement. This movement, in which a great number of women have come forward claiming to have been sexually harassed within a professional environment, originated in October 2017 when Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein was accused of using his position to sexually abuse women.

Legally, there are no laws preventing office romances and it is usually left to employers to determine how they are going to respond to them. However, although it may be tempting for employers to implement a complete office ban on romances, or ‘love contract’, this rule can be very unpopular among the workforce, highly difficult to enforce and potentially breach the human rights of the employees. It is therefore advisable for an employer to outline within their company policies what is considered appropriate behaviour in their workplace and place a requirement upon any individuals entering into a relationship to disclose this to their manager. From there, employers can decide if the individuals should work separately in order to avoid any potential conflicts of interest within ongoing projects or general working duties. This can also help to avoid accusations of preferential treatment from other members of staff if the relationship involves a manager and someone on their team.

Employers may also be concerned about what the implications could be if the relationship turns sour, which could expose the company to increased liability such as accusations of sexual harassment and discrimination. It is therefore highly advisable that clear policies are maintained that outline a zero tolerance policy to this kind of treatment within the workplace and that both parties to the relationship are reminded of this fact when they disclose it. If either individual is found to be operating in breach of this, employers should process the situation through their usual disciplinary and misconduct procedures.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In order to help to clearly outline the company’s stance on this issue, employers should aim to maintain an open, supportive and approachable culture that strongly encourages those considering entering into a relationship to come forward. This could be done by discussing the procedure for workplace relationships within inductions, ongoing company training or meetings. A proactive and strong approach to this may help in discouraging employees from keeping their relationship a secret, meaning that the employer can take steps to counteract any potential issues that could arise at an early stage. It could also mean that employees feel able to come forward if the relationship does end and the conduct of the other individual is causing them to feel uncomfortable at work, meaning the employers will be able to take action against that person before the situation escalates.

Kate Palmer is HR Advice and Consultancy Director at global employment law consultancy, Peninsula.
Kate joined in 2009 from a worldwide facility services company where she was Senior HR Manager. Her exploits included providing HR & employment law support to over 30 UK hospitals and dealing with high profile NHS union cases—expertise she now brings to Peninsula clients.
Today, Kate is involved in all aspects of HR and employment law advice.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Paul Russell: So you want to be…highly productive? The 5 Ds of productivity

Part 1 in a series of guides from Paul Russell, co-founder and director, The Luxury Academy.

Dr Alex Linley: Are people analytics and psychometric testing essential to recruitment?

"Managers are inevitably subject to some prevalent human biases."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you