Business groups unite to condemn new HMRC red tape on flexible workers

-

UK business groups have come together to express their deep concerns about new regulations introduced by HMRC. The proposals will create unnecessary and excessive red tape which will seriously disrupt the labour market.

Sounding the alarm on the new regulations are IPSE (Independent Professionals and the Self-Employed), REC (Recruitment and Employment Confederation), FCSA (Freelance and Contractor Services Association) and APSCo, (Association of Professional Staffing Companies.)

The proposals, which follow the ‘onshore intermediaries’ legislation introduced earlier this year will mean recruitment firms will have to collect, verify and report sensitive information about self-employed workers and company directors to HMRC. Whilst some reporting is needed to enforce the changes, these obligations go well beyond what is required. They will create a huge administrative burden and introduce risks in handling personal data, including age, gender and National Insurance number. For freelancers, the rules will require them to collect this information from anyone they subcontract work to.

Simon McVicker, Director of Policy and External Relations at IPSE, said

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“Throughout the consultation process, we have been repeatedly assured that legitimate independent professionals would not be affected by these new rules. It is therefore all the more ridiculous to find that thousands of freelancers will be forced to conform to the onerous reporting requirements now outlined in the draft statutory instrument. The regulations will strongly discourage independent professionals from subcontracting and collaborating with others.”

According to CEO of the REC Kevin Green “Obtaining the information required by the regulations will pose a challenge for our members, especially where they do not have a direct relationship with the self-employed worker. We fail to see why this is necessary, given the government already collects much of the required information, for example through RTI reports.”

Samantha Hurley, Head of External Relations at APSCo, believes the reporting requirements must be changed so that only company and payment information is sought. Removing the need to report personal data would significantly reduce the burden on recruitment firms and minimise the potential for data loss:

“As legitimate businesses, the independent professionals in question operate through limited companies, the details of which are already in the public domain. There is no reason for personal data to be collected on the individuals who own these businesses when the company information already available fulfils all the requirements of the new rules.”

FCSA Chief Executive, Julia Kermode, believes the government has not fully considered the cost implications of the proposals: “These regulations will impose a significant cost burden on businesses. Installing systems that can securely collect and store data is not cheap, one of our members has set aside a six figure sum to achieve this. For some small businesses it will be prohibitively expensive.”

IPSE, REC, FCSA and APSCo would like the Government to review these proposals as a matter of urgency, with a view to removing completely the need for recruitment firms to report the personal details of limited company directors.

Charles Staples is an editorial assistant at HRreview.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Preparing for Brexit – a checklist for HR

Organisations across the world face a period of uncertainty, following the UK vote to leave the European Union. As politicians decide if and when to invoke Article 50, initiating the formal exit from the EU, HR professionals are planning their strategy to handle an extended period of turbulence.

Alice New: How can ‘good conversations’ replace traditional performance reviews?

Read about the five key ingredients for ‘good talks’.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you