Scott Mills preparing unfair dismissal claim against BBC after Radio 2 sacking: report

-

The long-serving presenter is reportedly planning to pursue an unfair dismissal claim after being removed from his role amid controversy surrounding a historic police investigation.

The development is likely to raise fresh questions about workplace investigations, safeguarding procedures and how employers handle historic allegations where no criminal charges were brought.

The Mirror reported that Mills has instructed lawyers and intends to argue that BBC management had been fully informed about the police investigation years earlier, including the age of an accuser.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The BBC previously said it had been aware of the investigation but that “new information” later came to light. A source quoted by The Mirror said: “It’s going to get very messy indeed.”

Mills, 53, was dismissed by the BBC in March after allegations relating to his “personal conduct” emerged publicly. The controversy centred on a Metropolitan Police investigation launched in 2016 into allegations of historic sexual offences involving a teenage boy under the age of 16.

Police confirmed Mills was interviewed under caution in 2018. A file was later passed to the Crown Prosecution Service, which concluded there was insufficient evidence to bring charges. The investigation was closed in 2019.

The BBC has not publicly detailed the exact “new information” that led to Mills’ dismissal.

Questions over BBC handling

The case has attracted significant attention because senior BBC management were aware of the historic investigation before Mills was promoted to Radio 2’s flagship breakfast programme in 2025. The BBC later acknowledged it should have investigated separate concerns raised with the corporation in 2025 more thoroughly.

Mills had worked for the broadcaster since 1998 and had become one of Radio 2’s highest-profile presenters after replacing Zoe Ball on the breakfast show. His dismissal formed part of a wider period of scrutiny around BBC safeguarding, workplace culture and accountability involving on-air talent.

The broadcaster has faced repeated criticism in recent years over its handling of complaints and allegations involving prominent presenters.

Mills has previously said he fully cooperated with the police investigation and stressed that no charges were brought. In a statement issued through lawyers after his dismissal, he thanked supporters and former colleagues.

“The recent announcement that I am no longer contracted to the BBC has led to the publication of rumour and speculation,” he said.

“An allegation was made against me in 2016 of a historic sexual offence, which was the subject of a police investigation in which I fully co-operated and responded to in 2018.”

He also said the investigation related to allegations dating back nearly 30 years and noted that the police inquiry had closed seven years ago.

Employment law implications

Jo Mackie, an employment law partner at national law firm Michelmores, told HRreview the case was likely to focus heavily on what the BBC knew and when.

“Mr Mills will understandably want to clear his name, and it will be interesting to see what he produces in order to do so,” she said.

“Has the BBC been overzealous in dismissing him, perhaps making him a scapegoat at a time when the BBC faces criticism for historical wrongdoing by other employees prior to Mr Mills’ sacking? Or will the BBC say they relied on the implied duty of trust and confidence to dismiss him when presumably because they learnt of historical investigations without him disclosing them.

“We will have to watch and see how this transpires,” she said.

Chloe Grant, an associate specialising in employment law at London-based legal practice Bellevue Law, said the case could hinge on whether the BBC acted consistently and reasonably in its handling of the allegations.

“If Mills goes down the road of an unfair dismissal claim, the case is likely to turn as much on the BBC’s timing as on the allegations themselves,” she told HRreview. “Reports suggest Mills will argue he had already disclosed the historic police investigation years ago, while by contrast, the BBC says his dismissal followed ‘new information’ becoming available.”

Grant said it could lead to issues about whether the dismissal was based on genuinely new evidence or information already known internally.

“That raises a key legal question about the basis for the outcome. Was decision-making genuinely based on receipt of new information, or was the organisation acting on something already known?”

She said tribunals would likely examine whether the BBC had acted reasonably and consistently.

“In employment law, employers must show a fair reason for dismissal and that they acted reasonably in treating that reason as sufficient to dismiss. If the BBC had prior knowledge, yet continued to employ and promote Mills for many years despite that fact, it may be harder to argue that dismissal was a proportionate response at this stage,” she said.

Grant also warned the broadcaster’s internal process could face scrutiny if the case proceeds.

“There is also the issue of process to consider. Even in sensitive and/or high-profile cases, employers are expected to investigate properly and act consistently. Acting only when a story risks becoming public can leave an employer exposed,” she said.

“If the matter ends up before a tribunal, much will depend upon why the BBC acted when it did, and why not sooner,” she said.

The BBC has not publicly commented on the reported legal action.

Managing Editor at Black | Website

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

NHS badge review raises wider questions about political expression at work

A government-backed NHS review has reignited debate over political symbols at work and how employers can balance protected beliefs with workplace conduct.

Andrew Fettes-Brown: Leading with curiosity – why the built environment needs a culture shift to allow for innovation

Curiosity creates the conditions for learning, growth and understanding. It encourages us to interrogate problems properly rather than rushing to solutions.

Mental health ‘stigma’ still stops staff speaking to managers

Most employees remain uncomfortable discussing mental health concerns with managers despite growing workplace wellbeing investment.

UK set for biggest rise in unemployment among G7 nations, OECD warns

Britain is forecast to record the largest rise in unemployment among G7 economies this year as economic growth slows and labour market conditions weaken.
- Advertisement -

UK employers ‘risk falling behind global rivals on AI hiring’

UK employers remain cautious about artificial intelligence in recruitment while overseas rivals move faster to adopt AI hiring tools.

Carly Jenner of Apeel Sciences

A global people leader shares how list-making, wellness routines and international teamwork shape her working day in HR.

Must read

Top 15 Churchill quotes that could have been about HR

Here’s our list of the former prime minister’s greatest quotes that could have been about our everyday responsibilities

David Enser: How are reward packages in global mobility programmes being designed in the post-recession world?

In the ‘good old days’ before any global financial crises, selected management would up-sticks and take their family to far flung parts of the world, live in comparative luxury, educate their children at the best international schools and then move from one assignment to another. More often than not, as long as they were doing their job, the organisation didn’t question the cost or the long term gain for either party.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you