No female representation at FTSE executive level leads to substantially less profit

-

No female representation at FTSE executive level leads to substantially less profit

It has been discovered that FTSE 350 companies that have over a third of females at executive level have a net profit margin 10 times bigger than similar companies that have no women at that level.

This is according to the report ‘Women Count 2020’ funded by a gender diversity business, The Pipeline, which found that companies with no women at an executive level have a net profit of 1.5 per cent, whereas businesses with more than 33 per cent of women at executive level received 15.2 per cent net profit.

If these firms performed the same as companies with more than a third of women on their board, a further £47 billion could have been made in pre-tax profit. This amount of money could adequately fund the NHS for five months.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The report states that at our current rate, businesses will miss another generation of female talent. It also found that in 2020 there are only 13 female CEOs of FTSE 350 companies.

Additionally, the report looked in to individuals who have profit and loss (P&L) responsibility, as this position tends to lead to the CEO level. In FTSE 350 firms, only 10 per cent of P&L positions are held by women. It believes that the future of women leaders in the years to come remains “bleak”.

Theresa May, former Prime Minister and MP for Maidenhead said:

Whenever data reveals a disparity of outcome between groups, the challenge to those in power should be – explain it or change it. There can be no good explanation for the massive underrepresentation of women at the top of British business – so it must change. Every single male CEO who looks around his boardroom table to see nine out of ten male faces staring back at him needs to ask himself what he is doing to make his business one which his daughter or granddaughter can get on in. Act now to change your businesses, to make the most of every talent, and to play your part in making our economy one which works for everyone.

Lord Karan Bilimoria of Chelsea CBE, president of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), said:

The failure to develop and promote women into CEO or C-Suite roles has serious consequences, not least for profitability, especially for those companies who have yet to place a single woman onto their executive committee. We must do better than this. Dealing with the legacy of Covid-19 will require us to create and sustain an economy that works for and recognises the value of everyone, where we achieve a better Britain by all working together. To see the scale of the challenge ahead and the urgent need to change, I recommend this report as essential reading.

Lorna Fitzsimons, co-founder of The Pipeline, and one of the authors of the report said:

Women Count 2020’ report shows the stark difference in net profit margins of companies that have diverse gender leaderships compared to those who do not. During the most unprecedented economic challenge of our lifetime, the economy can’t afford for businesses to continually miss the opportunity to be more productive. Businesses and governments need to actively address this as an economic imperative if we want to come out of the inevitable recession any time soon. We will then emerge from this crisis together, stronger, and more united than ever in a post Covid-19 world.

Out of all FTSE indexes, it seems the FTSE 250 has the most women sitting at executive committee roles.

It was also found that construction and retail are the two worst performing sectors for gender diversity in senior positions.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

James Rowell: Turning expense management into a workforce advantage

Expense management rarely makes the priority list when organisations talk about workforce optimisation. Yet it has a direct impact on employee satisfaction.

Ann Casey: Global Mobility and Tax on Equity Incentives

Why should a company be concerned about the tax treatment of equity incentives? Ann Casey from Taylor Wessing explains why.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you