HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Sunday trading laws extension not “magic answer”

-

Potential plans to reform Sunday trading hours have been challenged by Sainsbury’s Chief Executive, Justin King, who has stated that extending large retailers’ opening hours on a Sunday is not the “magic answer” to the country’s economic problems.

Currently shops over 280m2 are only permitted to open for a maximum of six hours on a Sunday, between ten o’clock and six o’clock, although this restriction has been temporarily lifted, throughout the six-week duration of the Olympics and Paralympics. In response to this trial periods there have been calls to change the laws, including support from the Institute of Directors, whose spokesman, Mark Wallace said:

“We know there are people out of work or underemployed who desperately want more opportunities and we know there is an appetite among consumers to shop during normal hours on Sundays, so it is silly to have a rule that holds both groups back.”

However, despite standing to gain financially from such a move, Justin King said in a letter to the Telegraph:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“Maintaining Sunday’s special status has great merit for our customers and our colleagues, and relaxing Sunday Trading laws is certainly not a magic answer to economic regeneration. Sainsbury’s has put in place extended hours at only 30 of its 1,000 stores during the Games period.”

King’s comments will be welcomed by the ‘Keep Sunday Special’ campaign, led by union and church leaders. The Bishop of Oxford and John Hannett of shopworkers’ union Usdaw have said that the change would not bosst the economy and would lead to a “detrimental impact on family life” for retail staff and consumers.

Latest news

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Employment tribunal roundup: Secondment status, dismissal reasoning and whistleblowing protections examined

EAT rulings clarify secondment status, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and whistleblowing protection, with practical lessons on process and legal thresholds.

Mental health cited in a third of sickness absence cases ahead of sick pay changes

Stress, anxiety and depression are driving a growing share of workplace absence as new sick pay rules expand eligibility from April.
- Advertisement -

Peter Dando: Why ‘salary sacrifice’ needs renaming

Salary sacrifice schemes are designed to help employees make smarter financial choices - but they remain widely misunderstood.

HR hiring rises as firms respond to compliance pressure and employment law changes

HR and accounting roles see strong pay and hiring growth as businesses prepare for new employment law requirements and greater regulatory complexity.

Must read

Ruth Ferguson: LinkedIn is not the only social media tool for recruiters

Social recruiting refers to the process of acquiring candidates...

Laura Farnsworth and Emma Langhorn: Dressing to impress – discriminatory appearance codes

A recent report jointly published by the Petitions Committee and the Women and Equalities Committee illustrates that wearing high heels for a prolonged period of time can cause both short and long-term damage to workers’ health and wellbeing.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you