Manual SAP® System Copy Drains Enterprise Efficiency

-

Inefficient process management costs enterprises up to £600,000 per year

Redwood Software, the IT and business process automation experts, uncover research data that manually undertaking SAP® system copy is time-consuming, expensive and inefficient.

SAP recommends that enterprises perform system copies to create test, demo and training systems. The process is also required for migration, disaster recovery, and when a company changes its operating system and/or database. It’s a critical operation for any SAP enterprise.

Independent research conducted by IZEN Marketing, on behalf of Redwood, calculated the significant costs and risks involved in manually executing SAP system copy. Researchers examined how many times enterprises undertake the manual process each year as well as the cost in time and human resources.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Research reveals:

  • 92 percent of respondents use at least five employees to manually run system copy, with some using 20 people or more to undertake the critical task
  • 61 percent of those surveyed claimed it takes five days to run the process manually, and 35 percent said the process takes even longer
  • 56 percent of the companies surveyed run system copy quarterly, with 25 percent running the process only every six months

This means that, based on an average employee’s daily working wage, most enterprises lose around £52,000 per year performing system copy manually. Organisations that invest particularly large amounts of human resources to the exercise may, in fact, lose up to £600,000 annually.

“Most companies now have to operate large and complex ERP systems landscapes”, says Dr. Derek Prior, Research Director at Gartner. “Regular system copies are important, but they are time-consuming and expensive if handled manually, which is what the great majority of IT departments do today.”

“It’s worrying that so many enterprises accept the status quo when it comes to undertaking critical processes within their organisation,” said Tijl Vuyk, CEO, at Redwood Software. “SAP system copy doesn’t get the attention it deserves, despite being essential for upgrades, testing and disaster recovery. Business are often reluctant to run system copy as often as they should because of the pain and costs associated with it. But putting system copy lower on the list of priorities only exacerbates other problems, creating a vicious circle. It’s actually in a company’s best interests to make sure the process is undertaken more frequently in an efficient and automated manner.”

“Business process automation can eliminate traditional barriers that have held enterprises back in the past. With end-to-end process automation, enterprises can be empowered to undertake SAP system copy more frequently, more effectively and with increased reliability. This subsequently helps to achieve greater IT alignment with the overarching business strategy,” concluded Vuyk.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

James Collings: What does Sunak’s proposed changes to sick note procedures mean for HR professionals? 

James Collings explains the legal implications of what Sunak is proposing, and the liability issues that could arise if it's harder for people to get sick notes.

Prof. Vlatka Hlupic: Employee engagement as business intelligence

If you work in HR, the annual employee survey...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you