National Living Wage – comments from the community

-

A compulsory living wage of £7.20 an hour will be introduced in April 2016 for workers over the age of 25, the government announced this week.

Chancellor George Osborne revealed in the summer Budget that the current minimum wage of £6.50 for workers over 21 will be replaced with the new “National Living Wage,” which is projected to reach £9 an hour by 2020.

The chancellor said:

“Let’s be clear what it means for the low paid in our country. Two and a half million people will get a direct pay rise. Those currently on the minimum wage will see their pay rise by over a third this Parliament, a cash increase for a full time worker of over £5,000.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“In total it’s expected that 6 million people will see their pay increase as a consequence.”

While the benefits of higher wages are clear from an employee point of view, many feel that smaller businesses will suffer as a result.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) said the compulsory pay increase would cost 60,000 jobs as a direct consequence, although it predicts there will be a million more positions in total.

Kevin Poulter, legal director in the employment team at law firm Bircham Dyson Bell, said:

“For small businesses and entrepreneurs, the impact of increased wages (however the new ‘living wage’ may be introduced and enforced) as a way to fill a benefits void may limit future growth. The threat of an increased wage to £9 an hour by 2020 may also see some resistance, in spite of an National Insurance employment allowance for small firms increasing by 50 percent (to £3,000) from 2016.”

Lee Biggins, managing director of recruitment site CV-Library, said:

“The introduction of a National Living Wage is likely to oppose [other] positive changes. Despite it being a good introduction for those in low-paid jobs, it is likely to cause a contraction in job growth due to the increased funds that businesses will need to invest in higher wages.”

Peter Boreham, principal in Mercer’s Talent business, said:

“While the move is broadly to be welcomed, the timing of this initiative is a little unhelpful. Companies have already absorbed increases to the previous Minimum Wage over the last 5-6 years that have noticeably exceeded median market increases for other staff. They have also suffered cost increases on the back of the recent ruling that holiday pay should include overtime, and the introduction of pension auto-enrolment.

Whilst the corporation tax reduction will help to fund the change, it may not be sufficient for companies with a high proportion of lower paid staff.  Finally, there is a danger that this increase to fixed costs might damage employment if the economic environment becomes less benign or if competition from low wage economies and technology intensifies.”

Workers under the age of 25 will continue to earn the National Minimum Wage, which will increase to £6.70 this October.

Steff joined the HRreview editorial team in November 2014. A former event coordinator and manager, Steff has spent several years working in online journalism. She is a graduate of Middlessex University with a BA in Television Production and will complete a Master's degree in Journalism from the University of Westminster in the summer of 2015.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Tessa Harris: The Government’s New Flexible Working Legislation – All Change?

Changes to flexible working was a key principle laid down by Labour - but is it all change for employers?

Automation: Is it taking the human out of HR?

While globally we have seen computerisation replace traditional jobs such as cashiers and bookkeepers - how certain are we that robots will take over our jobs?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you