Motivate employees with science not money, says CIPD report

-

Employee motivation could be increased by implementing behavioural science techniques to understand the real impact of pay and reward on productivity, according to new research from the CIPD, the professional body for HR and people development.

The organisation’s report, Show me the money! The Behavioural Science of Reward’examines the role of monetary bonuses in staff motivation, highlighting alternative approaches that might produce better results when encouraging employees to commit greater effort for greater success.

Jonny Gifford, Research Adviser at the CIPD, said:

“These are interesting and challenging times for reward specialists. We need to recognise employees when they go the extra mile and add increased value, but there are a number of behavioural factors that should be considered when shaping a reward programme.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“Crucially, we must acknowledge that monetary rewards aren’t everything and that they can even distort people’s motivation. For example, enticing the workforce with financial incentives and a strong bonus culture can lead to unwanted, risky and even unethical behaviours. Equally, because we tend to overestimate our ability as individuals, many if not most people find performance-based pay attractive in the first instance, but ultimately disappointing and demotivating.”

By revising reward structure within their organisation, the report claims employers can take more control over the multitude of factors that determine an employee’s motivation and engagement.

The circumstances of a reward can be a significant indicator of its perceived value. For example, a bonus received during tough economic times will be perceived as having much greater value than the same reward given in times of prosperity.

Conversely, a bonus will hold less value if the person receiving it believes they have performed at a higher level than a colleague who has received the same amount.

Gifford added:

“The key is having a flexible reward package that takes into account behavioural nuances and doesn’t rely solely on a wad of cash as the only means to motivate staff. It’s a change in direction for many but should also be welcome news for organisations who, in a challenging economic context, need to be more creative with their rewards package.”

The report found that symbolic awards as a means of direct recognition were more likely to motivate a workforce because they are then driven by the desire to succeed in their role rather than chase monetary gains.

Schemes such as employee awards or discretionary ad-hoc gifts from line managers amount to a more intrinsic system, and are more financially sustainable year-round than annual bonuses.

Time and timeliness are key aspects explored in the CIPD’s report. It references a study by Zedelius et al, which found that when people were promised reward for a later task, they started to perform better at intermediate tasks, even when those weren’t subject to a reward.

It also explores the difference in perception between instant gratification and rewards that are of equal value but deferred, such as pension contributions. This difference is most clear among the youngest workers, who place the least value on pension contributions that they won’t receive for decades.

Charles Cotton, Performance and Reward Adviser at the CIPD, said:

“Workplace pension schemes boost employee pay packets by thousands of pounds over the course of their employment but without the instant gratification of seeing that money land in their bank accounts each month, many employees fail to value the schemes.

“When it comes to reward, it’s important that businesses regularly reinforce the total value of the package that they offer to individuals and pay equal attention to both short and long-term rewards. This can include communication and education, but should form part of a well-thought out financial wellbeing strategy.”

Steff joined the HRreview editorial team in November 2014. A former event coordinator and manager, Steff has spent several years working in online journalism. She is a graduate of Middlessex University with a BA in Television Production and will complete a Master's degree in Journalism from the University of Westminster in the summer of 2015.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Lee Grant: “Glocalisation” presents challenges and opportunity for HR directors

Recently at a conference in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Josh...

Improving Iceland’s Employee Engagement

The 2009 Sunday Times survey of the Best Big Companies To Work For in the UK ranked Iceland 14th in their top 20. Susan Yell the HR Director for Iceland explains how they got there.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you