HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

How do you tell the good managers from the narcissists?

-

shutterstock_127785641

When organisations set out to recruit new leaders, they typically search for candidates who are dynamic, prepared to make tough decisions, have self-confidence and the capacity to be strong negotiators.

These are just a few of the qualities that characterise effective leaders.

We also find these same qualities in people who have significant narcissistic tendencies. We would prefer not to have them as leaders, precisely because they may possess too much of a quality that is considered good in many contexts.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Run their own agenda

“People with narcissistic personality disorders will be interested in dominance, status, recognition, power and admiration. They may not think twice about using others to achieve their goals. Leaders who score high on narcissistic traits lack the ability to relate to others. They run their own agenda with no thought for the people around them,” says PhD candidate Christian Enger Gimsø at BI Norwegian Business School. This can mean poor leadership performance.

People with narcissistic personality disorders typically gravitate to management positions because they focus on power and status.

Many organisations assess a candidate’s leadership potential using traditional recruiting methods such as job interviews and checking the candidate’s Curriculum Vitae (CV).

How proficient are they at selecting the right candidates with effective leadership abilities, and how good are they at weeding out candidates with significant narcissistic traits?

In his doctoral project at BI Norwegian Business School, Christian Enger Gimsø conducted a study of how candidates with narcissistic traits are evaluated in the recruiting process.

He wanted to find out whether candidates with narcissistic traits earned a positive assessment for their leadership potential and, if so, whether they were also considered to be more suitable candidates than those with few narcissistic traits.

Gimsø conducted a study of 3200 candidates in connection with three different admission processes at officers candidate schools in Norway. The Norwegian Armed Forces’ officer candidate schools offer approved leadership training, which has developed many candidates into leading positions in Norwegian society.

Assessment of leadership potential

Candidates who seek admission to an officers candidate school must undergo a structured, standardised job interview. The interview is geared both to objective criteria and an assessment of the candidate’s leadership potential. Participants in the study have taken a personality test which measures factors such as narcissistic personality traits.

The study shows a positive link between the candidate’s score on narcissistic traits in the personality test and how he or she is assessed in the job interview. Candidates with narcissistic traits did well in the admission interview. The study also reveals a correlation between personality test results and whether or not the candidate was admitted as an officer cadet.

Candidates with narcissistic traits not only did better on the admission interview, they were also admitted as leadership talents (officer training cadets).

The crucial issue

Gimsø also conducted a follow-up study to reveal which part of the interview is most vulnerable as regards the candidate’s narcissistic personality traits.

There was no correlation between the interview assessments and the degree of narcissism in those parts of the interview dealing with objective criteria related to the candidate and the candidate’s CV.

Interviews aimed at evaluating the candidate’s leadership potential are scenarios where candidates with significant narcissistic traits reinforce their chances of being among the chosen.

Christian Enger Gimsø emphasises that the proven statistical correlations are not very strong, but the findings are consistent both over time and across sample groups.

“The study indicates that candidates with a high degree of narcissistic traits do better in the admission interview than candidates with a lower degree of narcissism. They are also more likely to be admitted,” the organisational researcher points out.

What you can do

Gimsø has developed four practical recommendations for separating good, effective leader talents from candidates with undesirable narcissistic traits.

  1. The candidates must be treated as equally as possible in the job interview. The interview should be well-structured, both as regards how the questions are formulated and how the responses are evaluated.
  2. Use multiple tools to assess the candidates.
  3. Don’t just look for the qualities you want. Also look for the qualities you definitely do not want to have (dark personality traits).
  4. Check references, but don’t just settle for the supervisor. Also consult with peers and subordinates. They may have quite a different perception than supervisors.

Reference:

Christian Enger Gimsø: Narcissus and Leadership Potential – The measurement and implications of narcissism in leadership selection processes. Series of Dissertation 4/2014, BI Norwegian Business School.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Rethinking Career Development to Build Tomorrow’s Workforce

Over the past few hundred years, our world has experienced three different industrial revolutions—the first driven by the use of steam, followed by electricity, and then information technology. Now there’s another revolution upon us, and its most marked characteristic is the dizzying speed of innovation.

Lindsey Armstrong: Keeping engagement engaging

Communicating with staff to build confidence is a key factor in employee engagement.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you