TUPE changes could increase employment costs, says B&ES

-

tupeThe Building & Engineering Services Association (B&ES) has stated that it is concerned that proposals outlined in a Government consultation on changes to the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (TUPE) Regulations could increase employment costs for service and facilities companies in the specialist engineering sector.

 

Peter Rimmer, Head of the Association’s Employment Affairs Department, said:

 

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“The Government is putting forward proposals for changes, to take effect from the autumn of this year, which we believe are unnecessary.”

 

Mr Rimmer went onto say that in his opinion both employers and trade unions were satisfied with the effect of the revised TUPE Regulations which were introduced in 2006, saying that they “introduced a degree of clarity and thereby reduced uncertainty”.

 

Commenting on the Government’s proposals, Peter Rimmer said:

 

“We feel that what the Government is now proposing will signal a return to the malpractice and abuse which – without the benefit of the 2006 Regulations – bedevilled the application of TUPE in outsourcing situations.”

 

According to the Government, the proposed changes will produce a net benefit to business of up to £30m a year; however B&ES disagrees, stating that it believes that the cost to business of a more uncertain legal and commercial environment has been overlooked.

 

The Government’s consultation closed on 11 April and responses are currently being analysed with the outcomes of the consultation expected to be announced in the near future.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Vanessa Sallows: ‘I am passionate about helping people return to work’

Following Mental Health Awareness Week, Vanessa Sallows, Claims & Governance Director, Group Protection at Legal & General, talks to HRreview about the ethical and strategic importance of mental health awareness in the workplace, her work on raising awareness, the misconceptions around Group Income Protection (GIP), and much more that HR should know.

David Freedman: Exploding expensive negotiation myths

Anyone who has had the misfortune to sit through...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you