AI can hinder recruitment and lead to a loss of talent

-

AI can hinder recruitment and lead to a loss of talent

Despite HRreview’s poll stating that Artificial Intelligence (AI) will benefit recruitment the most out of HR areas, as well as Brian Kropp, group vice president, of Gartner’s HR practice agreeing with this, a report has found that automation can actually lead to companies missing out on top talent.

The report produced by Carmichael Fisher, a consultant and researcher company found that 90 per cent of job seekers reject the notion of AI going through their CV. The majority (86 per cent) of job hunters would prefer their application to be reviewed by a human, rather than an applicant tracking system.

The report is called ‘The impact of artificial intelligence within the recruitment industry: defining a new way of recruiting’ and written by James Wright, a technology consultant from Carmichael Fisher.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It has been argued that AI is very effective at streamlining the recruitment process, but only if the applicant’s CV contains the relevant keywords relating to the position that has been advertised.

Video interviews were seen as just as unpopular of an alternative.

Just under three-quarters (73 per cent) believe that automation used in the hiring process will actively worsen their perception of a business and its brand.

However, 84 per cent of candidates feel the current recruitment process needs to change and is currently ineffective.

Research showed that people do support AI’s ability to lessen bias and improve diversity.

Mr Wright said:

The use of AI in the preliminary stages of recruitment is useful to analyse the market and to assist with areas of potential human error such as unconscious bias.

However, once you have a candidate shortlist, the process becomes intrinsically human and interactive. One of the most common words we found used in the study, when asking participants about using AI for the whole hiring process was ‘impersonal’.

The role of a recruiter is entirely based on consolidating solid and trustworthy relationships with candidates, getting to know them and their wants and desires. While the future of HR and hiring certainly will welcome AI to take over those more administrative tasks, the role of the human recruiter isn’t going anywhere yet.

HRreview’s recent poll which asked “what area of HR do you feel the introduction of AI will benefit the most?” showed that half (56 per cent) believe it to be recruitment. Mr Kropp also voted for recruitment as he believes in order for AI to work you need to have a clear outcome and recruitment is the easiest part of HR to measure if it has had a positive impact on it.

The poll had 48 votes in it.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Robin Hoyle: Modelling the desired culture

I’m not a football fan. But when I heard...

Simon Daly: Rethinking workplace success for future generations – building an environment of engagement over happiness 

When it comes to workplace fulfilment, it’s common to discuss employee happiness and engagement as one and the same. Yet the two states are different.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you