Language gap led to waste worker’s serious burns

-

Waste management provider, Veolia Environmental Services, has been fined after an agency worker was seriously burned by hot ash at an incineration depot in Deptford.

The employee, who does not want to be named, sustained 17% burns to his body whilst cleaning ash from a filtration hopper at a Veolia plant on Landman Way on 29 December 2009.

The ash fell onto him when he entered the hopper and started prodding it with a rod in order to clear a blockage. He was hospitalised for almost a month as a result of the burns he sustained.

An investigation by the HSE into the incident found Veolia did not follow its own policies and procedures for the management of dangerous tasks of this nature. This put a vulnerable worker at risk by failing to provide him with adequate information or supervision.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

City of London Magistrates’ Court heard that the employee, from Eastern Europe, spoke little English and had not been properly briefed in the working practices at the incineration plant.

Veolia ES SELCHP Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 for supervisory failings that led to dangerous working practices, was fined £5,000 and ordered to pay full costs of £12,243.

After the hearing, HSE Inspector, Kerry Williams, said:

“The victim was a vulnerable worker who should have been protected whilst working for Veolia Environmental Services. However, he wasn’t provided with the basic information, training or supervision to allow him to complete his job safely. As a result he was badly exposed and he sustained severe burns in an incident that could easily have been avoided.

“Veolia operates a high hazard site in Deptford and as such should ensure its systems are sufficiently robust to ensure people are not placed at unnecessary risk.”

Latest news

Menopause support gaps push women out of jobs as ‘masking’ takes toll

Women consider leaving jobs as menopause symptoms go unsupported, with many hiding their condition at work.

Workers ‘ignore AI tools and stick with manual tasks’ despite heavy investment

Employees are avoiding workplace AI tools and reverting to manual tasks, raising concerns about trust, usability and the value of tech investment.

Victor Riparbelli on AI boosting the value of people

“AI will make great human communicators even more valuable than before.”

Up to 28,000 employees affected by paper-based data breaches

Thousands of workers affected by paper-based data incidents as organisations miss reporting deadlines and overlook offline risks.
- Advertisement -

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Must read

Mike Dolen: How AI empowers managers to lead with clarity and confidence

Managers are holding organisations together, and it’s burning them out. Demands have escalated, but support systems remain stuck in another era.

Ally Fekaiki: Employee benefits: how to fix the one common HR practice employees hate

Employee benefits famously a pain point for HRs and hated by employees. Amidst record level vacancies, they've also become key ammunition to entice talent, with companies constantly announcing new perks.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you