HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Supreme Court grants Usdaw permission to appeal in Tesco fire and rehire case

-

The Supreme Court has granted the Union of Shop Distributive and Allied Workers (Usdaw) permission to proceed with its case against Tesco – in an ongoing battle over the supermarket giant’s use of ‘fire and rehire’ practices.

On the 21st December 2022, the highest court in the UK permitted the union – which is represented by social justice law firm, Thompsons Solicitors – to proceed with its case against Tesco, which wants to fire and rehire its staff in order to remove their entitlement to a long-term financial benefit called Retained Pay.

The case relates to workers employed by Tesco in its Daventry and Litchfield distribution centres who won a landmark legal victory in February preventing an attempt to dismiss them and remove their right to Retained Pay.

The High Court found that, as the parties had agreed Retained Pay was “permanent” and “guaranteed for life”; Tesco was not entitled to serve notice on the contract when its sole purpose for doing so was to remove the benefit in question. An injunction was granted to ensure Tesco was prevented from doing this.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

What happened in July?

A deeply disappointing decision was then made by the Court of Appeal in July which determined that the fact that the collective agreements contained references about Retained Pay being “permanent”, only meant it was guaranteed for the life of a particular contract of employment and there was no mutual intention from the language used that it would last beyond that.

On this basis, the injunction was discharged leaving Tesco able to serve notice on the contracts to remove the benefit.

Usdaw made it very clear following the Court of Appeal judgment that it would continue its fight and the Supreme Court has now given the union permission to do so. Usdaw maintains that “permanent” should mean exactly “what it says on the tin”, that the terms agreed between the parties about Retained Pay were absolutely clear as were the mutual intentions of the parties in agreeing those terms.

Neil Todd, a trade union specialist at Thompsons Solicitors comments on the fight Tesco faces:

“We are delighted to have been given permission by the Supreme Court to proceed with this important case. The fight against fire and rehire is a pivotal one for the whole trade union movement.

“Tesco faces a fight as Usdaw is resolute that the workers concerned were given clear commitments by Tesco that Retained Pay was to be a permanent feature of their income.”

Joanne McGuinness – Usdaw National Officer – adds:

“It has always been clear to us what we agreed with Tesco in respect of our members in receipt of Retained Pay. That is that they would have a right to this payment for as long as they remained employed by Tesco in their current role. The agreement was reached at a time when the organisation needed these individuals to remain in post as it could not have been operationally effective if they had chosen to leave. The workers agreed to remain in the business and relocate on the basis of the guarantee of these payments when they otherwise may have taken redundancy.

“We were therefore shocked when Tesco adopted fire and rehire tactics to try and strip this right away and this is why we sought an injunction from the High Court. We were very disappointed by the outcome at the Court of Appeal but we made clear it would not end there without some recompense for our members and we would exhaust every avenue to protect our members’ terms and conditions of employment. The decision to grant permission is a further step doing everything we can to continue this fight.”

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Ashley Savage: The Public Interest in Public Interest Disclosure

Clause 14 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill...

Arran Heal: Why HR need to focus on psychological safety, not wellbeing

"Employee wellbeing was high on the HR agenda before the Covid-19 period turned it into a major priority."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you