AI can hinder recruitment and lead to a loss of talent

-

AI can hinder recruitment and lead to a loss of talent

Despite HRreview’s poll stating that Artificial Intelligence (AI) will benefit recruitment the most out of HR areas, as well as Brian Kropp, group vice president, of Gartner’s HR practice agreeing with this, a report has found that automation can actually lead to companies missing out on top talent.

The report produced by Carmichael Fisher, a consultant and researcher company found that 90 per cent of job seekers reject the notion of AI going through their CV. The majority (86 per cent) of job hunters would prefer their application to be reviewed by a human, rather than an applicant tracking system.

The report is called ‘The impact of artificial intelligence within the recruitment industry: defining a new way of recruiting’ and written by James Wright, a technology consultant from Carmichael Fisher.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It has been argued that AI is very effective at streamlining the recruitment process, but only if the applicant’s CV contains the relevant keywords relating to the position that has been advertised.

Video interviews were seen as just as unpopular of an alternative.

Just under three-quarters (73 per cent) believe that automation used in the hiring process will actively worsen their perception of a business and its brand.

However, 84 per cent of candidates feel the current recruitment process needs to change and is currently ineffective.

Research showed that people do support AI’s ability to lessen bias and improve diversity.

Mr Wright said:

The use of AI in the preliminary stages of recruitment is useful to analyse the market and to assist with areas of potential human error such as unconscious bias.

However, once you have a candidate shortlist, the process becomes intrinsically human and interactive. One of the most common words we found used in the study, when asking participants about using AI for the whole hiring process was ‘impersonal’.

The role of a recruiter is entirely based on consolidating solid and trustworthy relationships with candidates, getting to know them and their wants and desires. While the future of HR and hiring certainly will welcome AI to take over those more administrative tasks, the role of the human recruiter isn’t going anywhere yet.

HRreview’s recent poll which asked “what area of HR do you feel the introduction of AI will benefit the most?” showed that half (56 per cent) believe it to be recruitment. Mr Kropp also voted for recruitment as he believes in order for AI to work you need to have a clear outcome and recruitment is the easiest part of HR to measure if it has had a positive impact on it.

The poll had 48 votes in it.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Mark Eltringham: The greatest challenge for the modern workplace is how to engineer serendipity

It’s not often that workplace management becomes national news...

Derek Irvine: 5 Common HR myths

It’s no surprise that business success relies heavily on an engaged and motivated workforce. The problem is that, while social recognition is increasingly regarded as an effective way of achieving this, there is a wealth of misinformation about how businesses should implement recognition practices. These myths not only have the ability to thwart a company’s effort to build a unified corporate culture, but it can end up impacting a company’s productivity level, and subsequently, bottom line. Here are some of the most common HR myths, and how these can be overcome:
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you