Eversheds: coalition government to have ‘an impact on the UK’s industrial action laws’

-

Martin Warren, practice group head of Eversheds’ human resources group, has claimed that the make-up of any new coalition government is likely to have an impact on the UK’s industrial action laws.

He said: “One of the first tasks of the new government will be to seek to reduce the UK’s budget deficit through public-sector spending cuts. If this translates into widespread redundancies, there will undoubtedly be reaction from the unions.

“And if we do see significant industrial action to resist such restructuring, a Conservative government might well seek to tighten the rules on strike ballots. However, such a move is likely to be difficult for any other coalition party to support.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Commenting on EU regulations, Warren added: “Throughout the pre-election campaign the Conservatives were vocal about their intention to reduce the EU’s influence on UK employment laws, but the reality is that this is a very difficult aspiration to implement for both legal and political reasons.

“If the hung parliament leads to a Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government, David Cameron’s hope of changing the balance of power on employment law is a non-starter.

And Eversheds also predicts an impact on the default retirement age, resulting from a hung parliament.

Owen Warnock, partner at Eversheds, said: “It will be interesting to see how a new coalition government – or indeed a minority Conservative government – will deal with the anticipated employment law reforms around the default retirement age (DRA). Despite the fact that there is cross-party agreement that the current DRA should be abandoned, the detail has not been decided and these issues are likely to bring with them strong reactions from all quarters.

“Currently the DRA enables employers to force staff to retire at 65 and there is much debate about whether this should be raised to 70 or scrapped altogether. The timing of this reform, and whether there should be any phasing-in period, is also hotly debated.

“Most controversial of all is whether removing the current DRA should be accompanied by other legal changes: for example, should workers have a statutory right to ask to work part-time or for an easier job as they get older? Or should unfair dismissal laws be amended to assuage employers’ worries about not being able to dismiss employees whose energy or ability is declining through age?

“Unions and employers are likely to lobby any government hard on this issue. How our new government reacts will be strongly affected by which party, or parties, are in power.”



Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Luke Menzies: Tougher-than-expected Gender Pay Gap enforcement

In all the commentary written on the Gender Pay Gap reporting (GPGR - not to be confused with GDPR) legislation, very little has touched on the consequences of an employer failing to comply with its duty to report and publish.

Darren Timmins: The importance of cultural fit when selecting your next business leader

Here at Otravida we know the importance of selecting...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you