Companies ‘to face higher penalties for corporate manslaughter’

-

Firms could face steep fines for corporate manslaughterEmployers found guilty of corporate manslaughter are set to face “punitive” fines which could cost them in excess of £500,000, it has been reported. 

According to the Financial Times, the Sentencing Guidelines Council has claimed fines for such cases should not fall below this mark and could set businesses back millions of pounds. 

From this week, all firms found guilty of manslaughter in court will have the fines imposed on them. 

This applies even if the case occurred years ago, the publication warns. 

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The council is also recommending any health and safety breaches which lead to a fatality should see a fine of upwards from £100,000 imposed. 

A further part of the penalty will include making it a recommendation that the guilty firm publishes details of the incident. 

Tim Hill, partner at law firm Eversheds, told the news provider that as employers could now face up to two years in prison if found guilty of such a corporate crime, “organisations should now be in no doubt that demonstrating a strong health and safety culture is as strategically vital as dealing with any other business risk”. 

Yet the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH), which was consulted on the new guidelines, believes an opportunity has been missed to ensure punishments have equal economic impact across organisations of different size and to emphasise the need for cultural change in many convicted organisations. 

“We believe using percentage of annual turnover (or equivalent) in setting fines would have helped ensure convicted organisations of different sizes felt the financial impact more equally,” said IOSH policy and technical director Richard Jones. 

“Remedial orders should also address the vital need for deep-seated cultural issues to be tackled where these have contributed to the offence,” he added. 

“Based on regulator guidance, we say this could include measures such as compulsory training or retraining in health and safety management for directors and senior managers, appropriate use of behavioural safety programmes, the introduction of third-party audit and access to competent health and safety advice.” 
IOSH also called for: 

• Absolute minimum fine levels for corporate manslaughter convictions
• Aggravating factors to include failure to heed professional health and safety advice, co-operate with authorities or remedy deficiencies
• Having a good health and safety record should be no mitigation in corporate manslaughter, given the gross breach that has occurred
• Clarity over ‘a different approach’ to setting fines in the public sector
• Corporate manslaughter convictions to affect Comprehensive Area Assessments. 



Latest news

Lauren Webb: Empowering women to lead the way in analytics and AI

Women remain wildly underrepresented in technical and digital leadership, making up just 22% of the UK’s AI talent. It’s jarring.

Employers urged to balance flexibility and fairness as England’s World Cup campaign begins

Employment lawyers are advising organisations to plan ahead for leave requests and workplace flexibility as the 2026 FIFA World Cup gets under way.

Amy Coleman on uncertainty and pressure at work

“Many of you shared feelings of uncertainty and pressure as the work evolves.”

Workers fear favouritism is driving workplace rewards and recognition

Many UK employees believe workplace rewards are influenced by favouritism, with women significantly less likely to view recognition as fair.
- Advertisement -

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Must read

Chris Harper: In AI we trust – rebuilding verification for a digital age

The systems we use to verify identities, credentials and histories are undergoing a fundamental change in the age of AI.

Adam Grant and Kate Meagher: Workplace discrimination: An age old debate

The end of compulsory retirement means employers need to be aware of their responsibilities when managing an ageing workforce.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you