Boxing Day tube strike challenged at High Court

-

London Underground (LU) has commenced legal action challenging the validity of the strike called by the Aslef union in a row over additional Boxing Day pay.

Aslef is calling for “substantial incentives”, thought to be treble pay, and a day off in lieu for those that work on Boxing Day. If the dispute is not resolved, the union intends to take further action on 16 January and 3 and 13 February.

The crux of LU’s legal action to block the strike is that, despite only a quarter of LU’s 3,500 drivers being scheduled to work on 26 December, Aslef has balloted all 2,200 of its members for strike action.

Howard Collins, LU’s Chief Operating Officer, said: “This threat of strike action is disgraceful, and Londoners will share our disbelief at these outrageous claims by Aslef’s leadership for even more money to work on a day for which their members are already being paid.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“LU has a long-standing agreement with all of its trade unions which covers working arrangements on public holidays, and Boxing Day is included in that.

“The Underground is a public service that should be playing its part in helping Londoners and the Capital have a happy and prosperous Christmas, and we will take every possible step to ensure that happens.”

An ASLEF spokesperson said the union was not surprised at the legal challenge, but it was disappointed.

They commented: “I am sure Londoners would prefer LU to be sitting down with the union hammering out a solution to this dispute rather than wasting time briefing solicitors and wasting money by pouring it into the pockets of barristers.

“We don’t expect the legal challenge to be successful and all it will do is increase ill-feeling which will make an agreement more difficult to secure.

“Legal action at this time is no more than a distraction.”

A High Court decision is expected today.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Charlie Pring: Tales of the unexpected, avoiding visa surprises

The UK's decision in November 2016 to refuse a visa for Paris Saint-Germain footballer Serge Aurier, denying him from playing in a crucial Champions League match against Arsenal in London, is a timely reminder to employers and international travellers about visa restrictions and the need for advance planning.

Deborah Lewis: Engagement – the fundamental conflict

Ever since William and Kate made their announcement, I’ve...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you