Kate Palmer: Do employees have a right to express milk at work?

-

new mothers encountering problems when expressing milk at work

With recent studies showing that breast feeding employees can often feel overlooked and isolated in the workplace, it is important that employers understand their statutory obligations towards staff in this situation.

Under current Health and Safety law employers are required to provide suitable facilities for breastfeeding mothers to rest, including having the ability to lie down, as well as to provide adequate rest and meal breaks. Despite popular belief, staff toilets will not qualify as an appropriate facility and employers are encouraged to provide a private room, where employees have the ability to lock the door and make use of suitable seating and rest facilities.

It is important to differentiate between providing rest facilities and facilities for staff to breastfeed or express milk, as there is no legal requirement for employers to provide the latter. It is ultimately up to the employer to decide if they are willing to provide this, however doing so will help staff feel more comfortable and avoid them having to express milk in an unsuitable environment.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Furthermore, if employers are providing facilities to express milk they may also need to consider providing facilities for storing the expressed milk. It is highly likely that breastfeeding mothers will not want to store milk in the communal staff fridge and some thought should go in to providing hygienic facilities for this.

There is also no express law which requires an employer to give paid breaks to breastfeed or to express milk. However, a complete refusal to consider requests or discuss and accommodate a workable solution could lead to claims of sex discrimination. Instead, from a good practice perspective, employers are advised to hold discussions with the employees to determine what can reasonably be done to prevent them from suffering any disadvantage at work.

Depending on the pattern of the work, expressing milk in the workplace may require the employer to consider allowing a short paid break from work in order to express milk. Considerations should assess the impact of the break reasonably against the likely impact it might have on the businesses. Only where this request will have a detrimental impact to the business and cannot be approved, will the employer have to consider more onerous steps such as reducing hours or finding alternative duties. It is important to treat and decide each request individually and fairly and carrying out an assessment on the steps proposed, rather than unilaterally determining it is unworkable.

Although this may be an uncomfortable situation for some, employers should look to hold an open and encouraging discussion with breastfeeding staff in order to cater to their needs effectively. Employers who take this approach are likely to be rewarded with increased employee loyalty in the long term and will be able to reinforce the idea that they are a family friendly organisation.

 

 

Kate Palmer is HR Advice and Consultancy Director at global employment law consultancy, Peninsula.
Kate joined in 2009 from a worldwide facility services company where she was Senior HR Manager. Her exploits included providing HR & employment law support to over 30 UK hospitals and dealing with high profile NHS union cases—expertise she now brings to Peninsula clients.
Today, Kate is involved in all aspects of HR and employment law advice.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Khyati Sundaram: Salary transparency can help tackle inequality as living costs soar

The cost of living crisis will be exacerbated if fairer hiring processes and salary transparency aren't rolled out to level the playing field across the board, argues Khyati Sundaram.

Philippa White: Is finding a purpose the answer to the ‘The Great Resignation’?

The reason for ‘The Great Resignation’, writes Philippa White, is people are looking for a change, and a way to find renewed purpose in their lives. But is leaving a job the way to do it?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you