Employers divided over government’s plans to enforce apprenticeships levy

-

Apprentice
“The introduction of the levy must be used as an opportunity to focus on raising quality levels so that apprenticeships are regarded as a viable alternative to university.”

Employers are divided over the government’s plans to introduce an apprenticeships levy, according to a new survey of large employers from the CIPD, the professional body for HR and people development.

The apprenticeships levy is a key part of the government’s plan to boost productivity and to encourage employers to invest more in their workforce training and development. 39 percent of respondents were in favour of the levy in principle, with 31 percent opposed and a further 30 percent undecided.

Ben Willmott, Head of Public Policy at the CIPD,said:

“Official statistics show that about six in ten apprenticeships started since 2009 have been at intermediate level 2, with typically about a third at advanced level three and just a fraction, three percent or less, at higher level. The introduction of the levy must be used as an opportunity to focus on raising quality levels so that apprenticeships are regarded as a viable alternative to university and not seen as a poor second choice for academic under-achievers.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“This is why we need a broader review of higher and further education funding to ensure that the further and vocational education is not treated as a poor relation in funding terms. More universities and other education providers need to build links with their local employers and help create more higher apprenticeship schemes.”

The CIPD’s survey of 275 employers, conducted to inform its response to the government consultation on the levy which closes today (Friday 2nd October), found that 30 percent of organisations believe the levy would encourage them to develop an apprenticeship programme to help build key skills. A similar proportion (30%) think the levy would help increase the quantity of apprenticeships.

However, the survey also shows that almost a third (31%) of organisations think the levy would cause them to reduce their investment in other areas of workforce training and development. A further 22 percent believe the levy could encourage employers to accredit training they would be running anyway as apprenticeship schemes, while just one in five (20%) of respondents think the levy will drive up quality of apprenticeship schemes.

Peter Cheese, chief executive of the CIPD, said:

“The Government has rightly focused on the need to increase the quantity and quality of apprenticeships in the UK and is hoping the levy will lead to increased investment by employers in these schemes. However, our survey suggests that boosting both numbers and quality at the same time will be a significant challenge. If the Government is serious about raising the quality of our apprenticeship system, it is important the levy is weighted towards increasing the number of apprenticeships at or above level 3.

“It’s also important the apprenticeships levy is not regarded as a solution in itself to the skills and productivity challenges facing the UK. Apprenticeships are important, but to ensure that people’s skills are developed and used effectively in the workplace, we also need to prioritise investment in organisations’ leadership and people management capability which underpins more strategic workforce investment. We need to balance the strong training and support that workers receive during an apprenticeship with lifelong skills development, to ensure that employees and businesses stay productive.”

The survey also found that the majority of large employers (47%) believe they should be able to use funding from the apprenticeships levy to invest in apprenticeships as they see fit. Just 10 percent of respondents think employers should only be able to use the apprenticeships levy funding for level 3 qualifications and above

When asked how the government could be sure that the apprenticeships levy supports the development of high-quality apprenticeship provision that meets employer needs, 39 percent of employers said there should be more oversight and evaluation of apprenticeship providers.

Just over a third of organisations think that an over-arching apprenticeship qualification should be introduced against which all apprenticeships should be assessed against, and 26 percent of respondents believe that to in order to improve the quality of apprenticeships the levy should only be used to fund level three and above apprenticeships.

In its response to the government consultation the CIPD makes the following points:

  • The apprenticeships levy is not sufficient in itself to increase organisations’ investment in skills and could have the unintended consequence of taking investment away from other workforce development and training activities
  • The Government should consider weighting the levy funding to encourage organisations to invest more in level 3 and above apprenticeships. This would still enable organisations to use an agreed maximum proportion of their levy funding for level two apprenticeships, but would require them to use the balance for level three and above apprenticeships
  • Employers that are investing in apprenticeship programmes for the first time will need high quality, independent advice to help them develop the right type of programme
  • There should be an increased focus on encouraging more universities and further education institutes to work with local employers to develop higher level apprenticeships
  • The evaluation and quality control of apprenticeship training providers needs to be improved

For more information on apprenticeship recruitment, listen to HRreview’s Inside HR webinar.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Scott Livingstone: Why it’s important to introduce graduate programmes that offer real responsibility

Scott Livingstone, HR Director at Chivas Brothers, discusses the need to introduce graduate programmes which offer real responsibility from day one.

Neil Pattison: Why mental health and wellbeing must be on the agenda

"Work can cause mental health issues or aggravate it."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you