72 days before a job is considered undesirable

-

Research carried out by UK Recruitment Company Randstad suggests that employers need to fill job vacancies within 72 working days before people assume that it is a job that nobody wants.

An online survey asked 2,000 members of the public:

“How many working days does a vacancy for a permanent job have to be open before it starts to look like a bad job that no-one wants?”

Looking at the findings, UK CEO of Randstad, Mark Bull, commented:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“The results show recruiting for a job vacancy is like selling your house. Leave it on the market too long and, for whatever reason, people start to think there is something wrong with it.

“With the current skills shortage, it’s not a good idea to hold out too long for a candidate: eventually that tactic will back-fire and become counter-productive. If you interview a good candidate, don’t wait too long before you offer them a job.”

The results varied slightly depending on where people lived with workers in London seemingly less concerned by the amount of weeks a position has been vacant, saying that they would not consider it to be a bad job until the vacancy had been open for 79 working days.

Whereas those in the north-east believe a vacancy open for 58 working days is perceived to be a job nobody wants.

In a separate survey of over 2,000 British employees working in businesses of all sizes, Randstad found that people feel they are working the equivalent of a six and a half day week in order to cope with increased workloads and reluctance from their employers to recruit additional staff.

Mark Bull said:

“It’s also worth noting that the UK’s employees already feel they are covering 30% more work than one person should be. If they’re cramming an extra one and a half days worth of work into a working week, they are going to find it extremely difficult to cover for vacant job posts, too.”

Latest news

Exclusive: London bus drivers’ ‘dignity’ at risk as strikes loom over welfare concerns

London bus drivers raise concerns over fatigue and lack of facilities as potential strikes escalate long-standing welfare issues.

Whistleblowing reports ‘surge by up to 250 percent’ at councils as new rights take effect

Whistleblowing cases are rising across UK councils as stronger workplace protections come into force, though concerns remain about underreporting of serious issues.

Bullying and harassment to become regulatory breaches under new FCA rules

New rules will bring bullying and harassment into regulatory scope, as firms face rising reports of workplace misconduct.

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.
- Advertisement -

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Must read

Rhian Brace: Drugs at work

When it comes to policy and regulation, it is...

Jack Fletcher – Big brother in the workplace – an overview of employee monitoring

What do employers need to do to make employee monitoring legitimate and what can they do with the information they gather through this?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you