Police drop beard ban following opposition from officers

-

Police Scotland has decided to abandon its beard ban for officers after facing strong resistance from its personnel who argued that the policy was impractical and burdensome.

The ban demanded that hundreds of officers remove their beards and moustaches by the end of May, citing the need for a clean-shaven face to properly wear protective masks.

However, the deadline was not met due to mounting criticism from officers, the Scottish Police Federation (SPF), and the LGBTI Police Association.

The SPF, representing rank-and-file officers, voiced concerns that some officers would be required to shave twice daily to comply with the FFP3 mask usage, and failure to do so could lead to misconduct charges.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In response to the outcry, Police Scotland has backtracked on the policy. Assistant Chief Constable Alan Speirs stated that the implementation would be postponed, and the controversial decision would be reviewed again in 12 months. The decision came after seeking further health and safety advice and taking into account the concerns raised by officers.

What opposition did it face?

David Kennedy, the SPF’s general secretary, praised the move, saying that the policy had faced significant criticism from various sectors within the police force. He emphasised the importance of understanding the necessity behind such a policy before implementing it, making the postponement a wise decision.

The initial policy, announced by Mr. Speirs in April, had aimed to mandate clean-shaven faces to ensure that officers could effectively use FFP3 masks during certain duties. Despite a perceived decrease in Covid risks, the requirement was intended to apply to officers attending fires, road accidents, and chemical incidents.

The policy faced backlash as officers argued that the risks had diminished and that the proposed rule was causing unnecessary distress. While Police Scotland has 17,000 officers and 6,000 staff, making it the UK’s second-largest force, it had not consulted with the personnel before announcing the ban.

Numerous officers expressed their grievances, and some even took legal action against the ban, alleging potential breaches of health and safety, discrimination, and human rights laws. The SPF reported an influx of complaints from officers opposing the policy, leading to employment tribunal cases and requests for legal opinions.

As of now, Police Scotland has not disclosed whether any resolution has been reached with the four officers who initiated legal action against the ban. Meanwhile, the Metropolitan Police’s most recent facial hair policy, introduced in September 2022, allows beards and moustaches but requires officers to maintain a neat and tidy appearance.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

James Uffindell: Securing venture funding and the importance of your team

We’ve just been lucky enough to secure some venture...

Caoimhe Carlos: How can you accelerate upskilling through industry certifications?

"Prolonged economic uncertainty and the rise of new technologies, such as ChatGPT and cloud-based tools, are exacerbating an already worrying skills gap."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you