Paul Holcroft: Why the scrapping of the EU Settlement fees is good news for employers

-

EU Settlement Scheme

The EU Settlement Scheme is set to be fully rolled out from 30 March 2019, giving all EU nationals the opportunity to obtain clearance that will allow them to continue to live and work, in the UK legally post Brexit.

When first announced in June 2018, applications were to be subject to a cost of £65 for adults and £32.50 for children, something that was likely prohibitive for many employees operating within low paying sectors. In a speech on Monday 21 January 2019, Prime Minister Theresa May announced that all applicants would no longer be subject to a fee, essentially removing a barrier that could, for many, have made the process difficult and prevented an application being submitted in time. This means that not only will future applications be free of charge, any employee who has already paid as part of a test phase will also receive a full refund.

Since their announcement, the fees will likely have caused concern for many employers, especially if they employ a significant number of individuals from Europe. Brexit may have already resulted in some employees being concerned about their job stability, which could have had a detrimental effect on their overall productivity and morale. A dissatisfied and unmotivated workforce may not be as inclined to work as quickly or efficiently as is required and be more difficult to manage. Some workers may even have considered leaving the UK as a result of this, depriving the company of otherwise highly valued and skilled employees. In this uncertain time, the removal of the fees can help to allay ongoing fears about job security, which can work to increase employee engagement. It can also help to make living and working in the UK remain an attractive option to any additional, fully qualified EU nationals who may have otherwise considered staying away.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In order to incentivise employees to have made the application, employers may have been considering covering the cost for the applications themselves, something that would likely have been difficult for smaller businesses. Failure to submit an application by 30 June 2021 will mean that the employee is living and working in the UK illegally. The result is that the company they work for would technically be employing an illegal worker, which can lead to a significant fine of up to £20,000 regardless of whether the employer was aware of the situation or not. Paying for their employees to submit the applications may have helped employers to avoid this but could have also given rise to further issues. The company would have had to assess how many of its employees the business could feasibly afford to pay for and if it should also cover the cost of the workers’ families. This could have led to accusations of favouritism or even indirect discrimination if they were unable to justify why they had chosen to assist one employee over another. Now there are no longer fees attached to these applications, employees are more likely to ensure they do submit the applications and help avoid further issues for the company down the line.

Employers should remember that a diverse workforce can be highly beneficial to the overall development of a business, providing individuals from varied backgrounds the opportunity to contribute to ongoing plans and strategies and broaden out existing language skills to attract further clients. Although it is still advisable for employers to encourage their workers to submit applications under the scheme and to consider providing time and resources at work with which to do this, the removed cost will make likely make the process much smoother.

 

Paul Holcroft is Associate Director of Operations at HR, health and safety and reward consultancy Croner. He is also a specialist of employment law and a regular seminar speaker.

Latest news

Lucy Standing: Older workers are back in the centre of the hiring debate – ready to lead the response?

For HR leaders, the argument is simple: the people being filtered out of your hiring process are not past their best.

One in 10 women quit work after pregnancy loss, report finds

Research suggests inconsistent workplace support following pregnancy loss and maternity leave is contributing to resignations and poorer mental wellbeing.

Fear of becoming obsolete grips workers as AI reshapes careers

More than two in five workers worry their skills could become outdated as AI reshapes hiring demands and increases pressure to keep learning.

Ford rehires 350 engineers after AI fails to deliver

Carmaker says veteran engineers have helped improve quality, mentor younger staff and retrain AI systems after automated checks fell short.
- Advertisement -

Low harassment reporting may hide workplace misconduct, employers warned

Low workplace harassment reporting rates may reflect a lack of trust in reporting systems rather than an absence of misconduct, new research suggests.

Jennifer Liston-Smith joins Halo Workplace Nurseries board

HRreview columnist Jennifer Liston-Smith has joined Halo Workplace Nurseries as chief purpose officer to help develop its workplace nursery compliance platform.

Must read

Shelley Hoppe: 5 signs your business needs an employee engagement plan

Is your business showing signs that it's in need of an employee engagement plan? Here are some tips to get your organisation on the right track.

Angela Love: Alternative routes to the same destination

With predictions citing that up to half the workforce could be working remotely by 2020, are graduate schemes the way forward for the future? Angela Love from Active discusses.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you