What is garden leave and when is it right for SMEs?

-

Garden leave is paid leave for an employee who is leaving your business to work for a competitor. But how do you know whether it’s appropriate, or affordable, for you to place an employee on garden leave?

The experts from Brighter Business, Opus Energy’s small business advice hub, have got the following advice. Read on to find out more.

 When is it appropriate for SMEs to offer garden leave?

If you think an employee (or a soon-to-be former employee) could carry sensitive or confidential information across to a competitor, then placing that individual on garden leave is an appropriate course of action.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It’s also a good way to distance an employee from your business to prevent sabotage or to avoid the poaching of other employees from your company by another.

It may make life slightly difficult for their successor without a formal handover process, but it’s a sensible way of protecting your business.

Cost consideration

Garden leave can be a difficult proposition for small businesses. The financial aspect will naturally be a concern, given that employees placed on leave still receive full pay even though their work will be spread across other people.

However, when considering garden leave you should think about the knowledge that the employee in question has and how valuable that is to your business – and how valuable it could be to a competitor.

If the employee is personally involved in a project which may give you a competitive edge, then gardening leave is a no-brainer. An employee who has been offered a role either at a direct competitor or in the same industry is a valuable asset to the competition, given that the employee will carry a vast knowledge bank with them.

The knowledge that they take away from your business needs to be replaced at some point, but limiting the damage is the primary concern. By removing an employee from the day-to-day, you limit their exposure to any confidential or sensitive information which could improve a competitor.

Non-compete clause

While it may be too late to implement this for the employee that’s leaving, it’s worth considering the insertion of non-compete clauses in employee contracts in the future.

These clauses stipulate that employees are not allowed to enter or establish a business which competes with their former company. These are not necessary in all professions, but in businesses where sensitive information could provide competitive advantage.

There are arguments against non-compete clauses; a government review has suggested that they are restrictive and stifle entrepreneurship by preventing experienced workers from starting their own business.

However, as a means of protecting your business against dangerous competition, it’s a good strategy and can help you to prepare for life without a valuable employee while giving you the confidence that they’re not out strengthening a competitor

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Michael Doolin: What employers need to know about remuneration packages and benefits

"COVID-19 has brought the importance of benefits, particularly non-financial ones, to the forefront and is a stark reminder than in an unpredictable world, flexibility, adaptability, and reactivity are key."

Phil Austin: Why HR teams should treat preventative care as a business priority

"Many of the stress-related issues affecting employees are both predictable and preventable."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you