What is garden leave and when is it right for SMEs?

-

Garden leave is paid leave for an employee who is leaving your business to work for a competitor. But how do you know whether it’s appropriate, or affordable, for you to place an employee on garden leave?

The experts from Brighter Business, Opus Energy’s small business advice hub, have got the following advice. Read on to find out more.

 When is it appropriate for SMEs to offer garden leave?

If you think an employee (or a soon-to-be former employee) could carry sensitive or confidential information across to a competitor, then placing that individual on garden leave is an appropriate course of action.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It’s also a good way to distance an employee from your business to prevent sabotage or to avoid the poaching of other employees from your company by another.

It may make life slightly difficult for their successor without a formal handover process, but it’s a sensible way of protecting your business.

Cost consideration

Garden leave can be a difficult proposition for small businesses. The financial aspect will naturally be a concern, given that employees placed on leave still receive full pay even though their work will be spread across other people.

However, when considering garden leave you should think about the knowledge that the employee in question has and how valuable that is to your business – and how valuable it could be to a competitor.

If the employee is personally involved in a project which may give you a competitive edge, then gardening leave is a no-brainer. An employee who has been offered a role either at a direct competitor or in the same industry is a valuable asset to the competition, given that the employee will carry a vast knowledge bank with them.

The knowledge that they take away from your business needs to be replaced at some point, but limiting the damage is the primary concern. By removing an employee from the day-to-day, you limit their exposure to any confidential or sensitive information which could improve a competitor.

Non-compete clause

While it may be too late to implement this for the employee that’s leaving, it’s worth considering the insertion of non-compete clauses in employee contracts in the future.

These clauses stipulate that employees are not allowed to enter or establish a business which competes with their former company. These are not necessary in all professions, but in businesses where sensitive information could provide competitive advantage.

There are arguments against non-compete clauses; a government review has suggested that they are restrictive and stifle entrepreneurship by preventing experienced workers from starting their own business.

However, as a means of protecting your business against dangerous competition, it’s a good strategy and can help you to prepare for life without a valuable employee while giving you the confidence that they’re not out strengthening a competitor

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Joshua Wöhle: Why 73% of AI usage is still happening outside of work

OpenAI recently released the largest study of ChatGPT usage to date - 1.5 million conversations analysed. The headline? Less than 30% of usage is work-related.

Giles Newman: It’s time to change perceptions of whistleblowing

"Whistleblowers can act as an early warning system that can shed light on sensitive issues organisations may be unaware of."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you