Men who apply for female-dominated jobs face a significant chance of being rejected at the application stage, suggesting the existence of deep-rooted gender stereotypes.
After submitting more than 12,000 resumes to over 4,000 job adverts in Australia, a study by King’s College London and Monash University, Australia, found that male applicants received around 40 percent fewer call-backs for roles that are typically dominated by females than women with identical qualifications and experience.
While the primary focus was to see whether male job applicants are affected by occupational gender segregation, the research also showed that men received around 50 percent more call-backs than women for male-dominated jobs, confirming the widely evidenced gender bias in the recruitment process against women for roles that have been traditionally dominated by men.
The large-scale study, led by Dr Mladen Adamovic, senior lecturer in Organisational Behaviour and Human Resource Management at King’s Business School, involved drafting and submitting thousands of resumes for roles in occupations that are defined as either male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-balanced.
Using a variety of traditionally male and female names from different ethnic groups, and ensuring the applicants were equally qualified, researchers compared the call-back rate for men with that for women.
Gender bias in the recruitment process
“Research into occupational gender segregation often focuses on the employment prospects of female applicants for male-dominated occupations. Not much was known about the relationship between occupational gender segregation and the employment prospects of male applicants,” explained Mladen.
“Our findings suggest that gender discrimination against both men and women in recruitment is caused by occupational gender segregation.”
What is occupational gender segregation?
Occupational gender segregation refers to the unequal distribution of men and women across different occupational categories.
The study focused on female-dominated occupations that included receptionist, waitstaff, administrative and sales assistant, human resource management professional, and cleaner. To allow comparisons, male-dominated occupations were also included such as construction labourer and electrician, as well as gender-balanced roles in marketing and accountancy.
The research found that men were least likely to get a call-back when applying for the role of clerk/administrative worker, sales assistant, receptionist or cleaner.
In light of the findings, researchers are calling for government, corporate and educational initiatives to help eliminate occupational gender segregation.
Dr Andreas Leibbrandt, co-author of the research and Professor in Economics at Monash University’s Business School, said:
“Occupational gender segregation is unlikely to disappear unaided. More government and business initiatives, which we often observe for the STEM professions, are necessary for other professions to tackle the issue of occupational gender segregation and hiring discrimination.”
The researchers also point out that while it is important to provide opportunities for people to access higher-paid jobs, it is also important to enable people to find roles which best suit them and that by diversifying the talent in their workforce, organisations benefit from different perspectives, increased creativity and fresh ideas.
Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.
