HRreview Header

Simple measures can prevent corporate manslaughter charges

-

When an employee or member of the public dies as a result of some negligent act, it is not only an extremely traumatic event but in the vast majority of cases the situation is easily avoidable, Bibby Consulting & Support has said.

The health and safety advisor and employment law specialist was reacting to the largest ever fine being imposed on a company convicted under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, which came into effect in April 2008. Just one month later, an employee of Lion Steel Equipment of Hyde, Greater Manchester, was killed after falling through a skylight. While the case against individual directors was dropped, the company was still prosecuted, found to be culpable and fined £480,000 plus £84,000 costs.

According to Bibby Consulting & Support’s Managing Director Michael Slade, the size of the fine is an illustration of what companies can expect if they fail fundamentally in their duty to protect their employees.

“Cases like these can send a company into liquidation,” he said. “Even for businesses with a substantial turnover, this size of fine, while not intended to send the firm under, is intended to hurt. In fact, the fine was 20 per cent lower than it could – and perhaps should – have been so in that respect the company was very lucky.”

Slade went on: “But the situation could so easily have been avoided. Any company that has skylights should know they are fragile. It isn’t difficult to cover the skylights or net them underneath – it is fundamental and basic practice, but a man is now dead because the company did not put the appropriate safe systems in place. This negligence was reflected in the size of the fine, but regrettably the whole tragic event was wholly avoidable. It is absolutely essential that companies can prove that they have implemented safe working practices and procedures and communicated these to staff”.

The current act was introduced because previous legislation had proved too difficult to enforce, but this is now the third case where a company has been successfully prosecuted so it looks as though the act is here to stay.

Latest news

James Rowell: The human side of expenses – what employee behaviour reveals about modern work

If you want to understand how your people really work, look at their expenses. Not just the total sums, but the patterns.

Skills overhaul needed as 40% of job capabilities set to change by 2030

Forecasts suggest 40 percent of workplace skills could change by 2030, prompting calls for UK employers to prioritise adaptability.

Noisy and stuffy offices linked to lost productivity and retention concerns

UK employers are losing more than 330 million working hours each year due to office noise, poor air quality and inadequate workplace conditions.

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.
- Advertisement -

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.

Must read

Why hidden emotions behind Brexit should sound a warning for global mobility and international business

Survey shows workers in the UK are anxious, insecure, trapped and uncertain – and Europeans call Brexit foolish, small minded and deluded

Connie Barrow: Are you giving candidate screening the attention it deserves?

I recently read an article published on the Telegraph’s...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you