Sky Sports pundit, Phil Thompson, loses £300,000 IR35 case

-

Hot on the heels of the Atholl House case, also known as the Kaye Adams case, another significant IR35 battle has concluded, resulting in a victory for HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

This time, the focus was on Sky Sports presenter Phil Thompson, who provided services through his personal service company, PD & MJ Ltd.

The tribunal found in favour of HMRC, declaring that the Chapter 8 intermediaries legislation (IR35) applied, and PD & MJ Ltd owed approximately £294,306.68 for PAYE and national insurance contributions (NICs) spanning the years 2014 to 2018.

The crux of the case revolved around the examination of a hypothetical contract to determine whether Thompson had a contract of employment with Sky or operated as a self-employed individual under a contract for services.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The FTT concluded that when considering the entire picture, the factors combined to establish a contract of employment. Notably, the FTT did not consider Thompson’s later employment status as it post-dated the relevant period.

This decision contrasts with a previous case involving Stuart Barnes, where the individual demonstrated a higher degree of being in business on his own account.

Despite the ruling, it is important to note that this FTT decision does not set a precedent, and Thompson has 56 days to appeal.

Qdos Reacts to Phil Thompson’s £300k IR35 Loss

IR35 specialist Qdos responded to the news of Phil Thompson’s loss in the IR35 case, which carries an approximate tax liability of £300,000. Seb Maley, CEO of Qdos, emphasised the complexity of IR35 rules and HMRC’s persistent pursuit of perceived non-compliance among high-profile freelance presenters.

Maley noted the contrast with the recent Kaye Adams case, underlining the intricate nature of IR35 regulations. Despite the outcome, Maley pointed out that most freelancers and contractors can demonstrate genuine self-employment, urging businesses to rigorously review each freelancer’s IR35 status to avoid costly non-compliance issues.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Menopause support gaps push women out of jobs as ‘masking’ takes toll

Women consider leaving jobs as menopause symptoms go unsupported, with many hiding their condition at work.

Workers ‘ignore AI tools and stick with manual tasks’ despite heavy investment

Employees are avoiding workplace AI tools and reverting to manual tasks, raising concerns about trust, usability and the value of tech investment.

Victor Riparbelli on AI boosting the value of people

“AI will make great human communicators even more valuable than before.”

Up to 28,000 employees affected by paper-based data breaches

Thousands of workers affected by paper-based data incidents as organisations miss reporting deadlines and overlook offline risks.
- Advertisement -

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Must read

Christoph C. Cemper: What could good AI usage policies look like for businesses?

Reports have indicated that 65% of companies don’t have adequate policies in place to govern the use of generative AI.

Nick Gold: People-powered productivity in the AI era

While AI offers benefits, it isn’t going to change things overnight. And if we have people in our business, it’s our duty to create the environment for them to thrive.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you