HRreview Header

68 per cent of employers back pension compulsion

-

Is compulsion the solution to UK pension crisis?
Is compulsion the only solution to the UK pension crisis?
The overwhelming majority of UK employers believe they have a paternalistic duty to provide their staff with a decent pension, but are adamant that compulsion in the work place is the only way to avoid a meltdown in UK pension provision, according to a survey conducted by national pension adviser AWD Chase de Vere Consulting.

Almost seven out of ten employers (68 per cent) believe that making properly funded pensions compulsory in the workplace is the only way to avoid a meltdown in pension provision in the UK, and fewer than 2 per cent disagree. With the ongoing delays in the introduction of the government’s flagship National Employment Savings Trust policy, the newly renamed Personal Accounts, compulsion cannot come soon enough for most employers says AWD Chase de Vere Consulting.

Fortunately for UK plc a huge majority of employers still believe in pension provision in the workplace, with almost six out of ten (58 per cent) saying that they have a paternalistic duty to provide their staff with a decent pension scheme. Only 15 per cent of employers do not see workplace pension provision as a paternalistic duty.

Param Basi, Technical Director, AWD Chase de Vere Consulting says:
“With the UK facing a vast pension black hole the government needs to pull it’s finger out and back full pension compulsion in the workplace while there is still the appetite by employers to provide workplace pensions.

“Our survey shows that employers really want to provide pensions, but with competitive pressures mounting there is a real risk that many will pull back from pension provision without full compulsion. Making pensions compulsory in the workplace is the only way to create a level playing field between employers in the UK and to keep the cost of pension provision off the public purse.

“We’re now onto the third iteration of the government’s workplace pension policy, first it was called the National Pension Saving Scheme (NPSS), then Personal Accounts (PA) and now it’s to be known as the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST). Rather than constantly changing the name, implementation date and contribution rates, they really need to just get on with it before it’s too late.”


employmentlawpagebanner


Latest news

James Rowell: The human side of expenses – what employee behaviour reveals about modern work

If you want to understand how your people really work, look at their expenses. Not just the total sums, but the patterns.

Skills overhaul needed as 40% of job capabilities set to change by 2030

Forecasts suggest 40 percent of workplace skills could change by 2030, prompting calls for UK employers to prioritise adaptability.

Noisy and stuffy offices linked to lost productivity and retention concerns

UK employers are losing more than 330 million working hours each year due to office noise, poor air quality and inadequate workplace conditions.

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.
- Advertisement -

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.

Must read

Can remote working affect your employee’s mental health?

Managing employees’ mental health is an important issue for employers as recent figures show UK businesses lose £100m every year due to work-related stress, depression and anxiety.

Chris Weaver: Just what is the employment status of Uber drivers?

Over the summer it was reported that the GMB trade union was launching legal action against Uber over its treatment of drivers who are GMB members.  It claims that drivers working for Uber are in fact "employees" or "workers" and not, as Uber asserts, self-employed "business partners".  If the employment tribunal agrees that the drivers are workers or employees then Uber will face substantial liabilities for failing to grant them basic rights under employment law.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you