IBM claims it has saved 12,000 hours by using AI for automation

-

In the midst of a global AI frenzy sweeping through the tech world, one iconic American company, known as the ‘Big Blue’ – IBM, stands at the forefront, reaping the extraordinary benefits of this cutting-edge technology.

Over the past decade, IBM has been tirelessly developing a plethora of AI tools that aim to revolutionise the way businesses operate, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and productivity.

But amidst the recent surge in AI’s popularity, a revelation from IBM’s Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO), Nickle LaMoreaux, has captivated industry insiders and employees alike, shedding light on the remarkable progress witnessed within the company in recent months.

LaMoreaux reveals that AI has liberated employees from tedious back-office administrative tasks, empowering them to delve into more nuanced work that requires the unique touch of human ingenuity.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In fact, IBM’s HR department alone has saved an astonishing 12,000 hours in the past 18 months by automating systems that previously demanded laborious exchanges between managers and employees.

A pause in hiring for who?

Yet, here lies the irony: the very technology IBM employs to expedite mundane processes might ultimately render certain jobs obsolete. Last May, the company announced a pause in hiring for back-office roles, many of which are human resources positions responsible for tasks like drafting employment letters or overseeing employee transfers across departments—tasks that AI could now seamlessly perform. LaMoreaux assures us that this strategic decision to freeze hiring for such roles was made with great intentionality.

In a notable address earlier this year, IBM’s CEO Arvind Krishna passionately argued that AI empowers employers to tackle repetitive tasks, thereby freeing up their workforce to engage in higher-value work. Drawing attention to IBM’s own achievements, he proudly mentioned how the company’s use of AI has dramatically reduced the number of HR professionals handling manual labor from a staggering 700 to a lean team of fewer than 50.

How is AI impacting the job market?

The impact of AI on the job market has long been a cause for concern. In a recent report, the World Economic Forum warned that AI could potentially affect around 40 percent of all working hours, with roles in clerical and secretarial positions expected to experience a swift decline.

Hence, the question lingers: Will AI inevitably lead to job losses within IBM? Earlier this year, the company’s visionary leader boldly stated that he could foresee AI seamlessly replacing up to 30 percent of these positions within five years, potentially affecting approximately 7,800 jobs across the company.

As IBM fearlessly embraces the transformative power of AI, the world eagerly watches, fascinated by the delicate dance between technological advancement and human workforce.

The future of work is at stake, and IBM’s resolute journey toward automation serves as a profound testament to the evolving landscape of employment.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

What rights do employees have during a heatwave?

Jane Crosby from law firm Hart Brown discusses what rights employees have, and what duties of care an employer has, to ensure the health of everyone in the workplace as temperatures soar.

Steve Leigh: Are you turning Gen Z talent away?

There have been numerous high-profile instances of brands being criticised for their employer brand over the past few years, says Steve Leigh.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you