Starmer endorses remote work and criticises ‘presenteeism’ for hampering productivity

-

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has voiced strong support for remote working, following warnings from Downing Street that a prevailing “culture of presenteeism” is detrimental to productivity.

This comes as the government considers introducing a “right to switch off,” a policy that would enable employees to disengage from work-related communications outside of office hours.

The proposed legislation, spearheaded by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, is part of a broader reform aimed at enhancing workers’ rights and addressing Britain’s persistently low productivity levels. Under the plan, a code of practice would be established, offering guidelines on how employers should manage after-hours contact with their employees. Workers who are habitually disturbed outside of working hours could potentially receive significant compensation.

Downing Street has emphasised that this initiative is designed to strike a balance between the flexible working practices that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to prevent employee burnout. “Good employers understand that for workers to stay motivated and productive, they need to be able to switch off,” a spokesperson for the Prime Minister stated. “A culture of presenteeism can be damaging to productivity.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Against a one-size-fits-all approach

The government recognises that a one-size-fits-all approach is not feasible, acknowledging that different industries and roles have varying requirements. However, the emphasis remains on avoiding the blurring of work-life boundaries, which can lead to employee fatigue and reduced efficiency.

Starmer’s endorsement of flexible working marks a significant departure from the stance of the previous Conservative government, which had pushed for civil servants to return to the office post-pandemic. The Labour administration has since softened these measures, reflecting a more supportive attitude toward remote working practices.

Despite these reforms, concerns have been raised by some business leaders, including Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow business secretary. Hollinrake warned that Labour’s proposed changes could stifle growth and urged the government to consult with businesses to ensure the right balance between flexibility and productivity is achieved.

In response to questions about whether the new “right to switch off” would extend to civil servants and advisers within No 10, a Cabinet Office minister confirmed that working hours for these employees are clearly defined in their contracts.

Sir Keir’s stance on work-life balance is personal as well as political. Before taking office, he famously pledged not to work past 6 p.m. on Fridays to spend time with his family. However, since assuming the role of Prime Minister, he has faced a series of crises that have tested this commitment.

Starmer’s shift toward embracing flexible working signals a broader transformation in how the government views the modern workplace, aiming to foster an environment where productivity is driven by outcomes rather than hours spent at a desk.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Jock Chalmers: The problem with Midsomer Murder

You probably will have seen the recent press coverage...

Eloise Allen: Avoiding the danger of disengagement

Eloise Allen explains why it all comes down to tuning in to the specific mood, wants, and needs of your people.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you