Warning over impact of new tribunal reforms

-

The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas) has warned that the government’s plans to introduce a fee for workers to bring cases to an employment tribunal could lead to more staff disputes, the Telegraph has reported.

Andrew Wareing, chief operating officer at Acas, has suggested that the proposed plans could result in companies not bothering to resolve issues unless they knew the member of staff was “prepared to pay” to take the case to tribunal.

“One of the great uncertainties about how parties will react will come when fees are levied,” he told the Telegraph.

“Our prime focus is on what it will mean for our ability to resolve cases. If in future a person has to make a payment to make a claim, employers won’t be that interested in early mediation.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Around 218,000 claims over discrimination in the workplace or other disputes were brought to employment tribunals in the year 2010-11, costing employers an average of £4,000 to defend per case.

However, under the new reforms workers will have to pay a fee of up to £1,750 to have their case heard, a sum that critics of the proposals fear will put employees off lodging a legitimate claim.

Meanwhile, moves to promote mediation as a means to resolve workplace disputes have been welcomed as a positive alternative to employment tribunals.

Paul Randolph, from the Civil Mediation Council (CMC), said: “It is most encouraging to see the government adopting such a pro-active approach to promoting the increased use of mediation in workplace disputes.

“Mediation presents a less costly, less stressful and more empowering way of tackling workplace disputes and the CMC are pleased that the government share this view.”

However, the Telegraph reports that the latest statistics from Acas reveal that only five per cent of employers have as yet used mediation to solve a workplace dispute.

“Workplaces need to move into the modern era of solving disputes by finding a common ground between both parties. There are no winners and losers,” Mr Wareing added.

Latest news

New Sainsbury’s dismissal reignites debate over shoplifting intervention policies

Supermarket safety policies are under scrutiny as more retail workers lose jobs after confronting suspected thieves.

Cheryl-Anne Cooper: How human-led guest services drive employee wellbeing

The way people feel in a workplace matters just as much as how it functions, and guest service teams deliver experiences that reflect a brand’s culture and values.

Workplace injuries hit 60,000 as safety gaps widen across UK

Workplace accident rates reveal steep regional and sector differences, with serious injuries and fatalities continuing in high-risk industries.

Civil service attendance row raises questions over remote work oversight

Concerns over hybrid working oversight grow after claims of low office attendance across parts of the civil service.
- Advertisement -

UK leads Europe on salary transparency as EU pay deadline approaches

UK job adverts remain more open about pay than those in other major European economies as new transparency rules approach across the EU.

From factory floor to HR leader at CEVA Logistics

An HR leader at CEVA Logistics reflects on career growth, commuting, learning, leadership and balancing work with life at home.

Must read

Tessa Boshoff: 5 strategies for uniting global teams in today’s workplace

"In today’s interconnected world, HR leaders face many challenges when it comes to building cohesive teams across diverse cultures, languages, and time zones."

Alice Evans: Employees are retiring later and working longer

One out of every five UK pension scheme members expect to work into their 70s, according to research by Willis Towers Watson, with working later perceived as the main solution to inadequate retirement savings for those over 50.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you