HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Government amends retirement abolition regulations

-

The UK Government has laid before Parliament a revised version of the regulations which will abolish the default retirement age, after concerns were raised by lawyers and employer groups about the wording of the original draft. Owen Warnock, partner at international law firm Eversheds, comments:

“The regulations make it unlawful for employers to compel employees to retire unless the retirement can be justified as an exceptional case not withstanding the general ban on age discrimination. Although the regulations take effect from 6 April 2011, the Government assured employers that the old rules would not simply be abolished in April but would be phased out over a six month period so that retirements already set in train before the rule change could continue to completion. However, when the draft regulations were published two weeks ago we were perturbed to see that the transitional arrangements were not as expected. Under those regulations the new regime would have applied straight away to anyone who had already reached retirement age before 6 April. The bizarre consequence would have been that employees turning 65 over the next six months could have been retired, but those already over 65 could not without risking claims of age discrimination. This would be the case even if the employer had already served a legitimate notice of retirement.

“Employers will be relieved that the Government acted swiftly to amend the proposed regulations. But although the problem with the original version of the regulations has been addressed, there is still a trap which all employers will need to take care to avoid. Employers still need to review retirement notices which have already been issued and are pending, as well as those retirement notices which are planned to be issued before 6 April. Any such notices which will lead to a retirement after 5 April need then to be checked more carefully since such a notice will not work – even if it was perfectly lawful when issued – for any employee who will not be 65 before 1 October 2011. In such a case consideration should be given to withdrawing the notice. Some employers might contemplate retiring such employees before 6 April 2011 by giving short (ie less than 6 months’) notice of retirement. However, this approach is not without risk, potentially leaving the employer open to age discrimination and/or unfair dismissal claims.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Natalie Vescia: How to avoid the festive season performance slump

As we’re now firmly in the fourth quarter of...

Derek Mackenzie: What does the London Growth Plan mean for job seekers and businesses?

London mayor Sadiq Khan and shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves recently unveiled the London Growth Plan to create 150,000 high-quality, high-paid jobs by 2028, highlights Derek Mackenzie.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you