Employment tribunal fees “put a hurdle in front of workers seeking justice”

-

In a press release issued on Monday, the TUC highlighted its concerns, asserting that such fees would place a significant obstacle in the path of workers seeking justice for issues like discrimination, unfair dismissal, or withheld wages.

The union body expressed apprehension that the proposed fees would favour “bad bosses” and empower them to disregard the rights of their staff.

The Supreme Court had invalidated a previous tribunal fees regime in 2017, citing its adverse impact on access to justice.

Despite this, the government appears determined to revisit the issue, prompting criticism from the TUC.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak condemned the government’s stance, stating, “This is another example of ministers taking the side of bad bosses, not working people.” Nowak emphasised that the government’s proposal would exacerbate the challenges faced by workers seeking justice and underscored the importance of protecting the rights of those facing discrimination or unfair treatment.

Additional barriers

Nowak cited the recent high-profile case involving P&O Ferries, where the company’s abrupt dismissal of 800 workers prompted minimal government action. He argued that introducing fees for employment tribunals would create additional barriers for individuals seeking justice during their most vulnerable moments.

“The Tories have already tried this and failed,” Nowak pointed out, referencing a previous attempt to introduce tribunal fees that resulted in a significant drop in claims. The Supreme Court had intervened, deeming the fees an interference with access to justice.

“Working people shouldn’t be picking up the bill for exploitative employers’ poor behaviour. Employment tribunal fees are just an invitation for bad bosses to ride roughshod over workers,” Nowak added.

The TUC’s strong opposition to the government’s consultation signals a potential showdown between workers’ rights advocates and the authorities, with the outcome likely to shape the landscape of employment tribunals in the coming months.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Jessica Pryce-Jones & Julia Lindsay: Ten top tips for running successful meetings

We’ve all been there. Stuck in a meeting that...

HMRC steps up its campaign against personal service companies

A new consultation document heralds a reform to the taxation of contractors working through personal service companies, writes Elizabeth Middleton of law firm Cripps.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you