Employers concerned about cost and admin burden of Additional Paternity Leave

-

Employers are concerned that the new Additional Paternity Leave (APL) rules will negatively impact their companies, according to law firm Davies Arnold Cooper.
The report shows 82% of employers surveyed think cost, absence or administrative burdens prove harmful.

The main employer concerns are cost of providing cover (35%), too many employees being absent (8%), administration costs (2%) or all of the above (48%)

But most employers (74%) think less than a quarter of eligible employees would take advantage of their new right to APL, which will enable new fathers to request up to six months’ paternity leave from April 2011 onwards.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The finding, that 64% of companies say at present less than a quarter of eligible employees in their organisations took any paternity leave, reinforces this.

When respondents stated they expected APL to be taken, half (53%) believed that employees would take less than one month of leave, while a further 43% believed employees would take no more than between one and three months.

Only 2% of respondents expect any of their employees to take the maximum six months available.

The self-certification process for the father concerned 76% of respondents, while 94% indicated they would prefer to be provided with information from the mother’s employer and a copy of the birth/adoption certificate automatically.

Whilst HMRC is going to undertake spot compliance checks, it does not seem that this sufficiently reassures employers. On a more positive note, 30% of respondents believed a benefit would be that mothers would return to work earlier and 42% also believed that greater flexibility in respect of childcare was advantageous to their organisation.

Wendy Trehy, partner and employment law specialist at Davies Arnold Cooper, said: “Despite the fact that there was a significant amount of consultation undertaken by the Government on the introduction of APL, employer opinion is divided and significant concerns remain. We will have to wait and see how many fathers do take up this right, what the costs to employers ultimately are and if this has the adverse impacts feared.

“Carefully tailored policies can eliminate many areas of concern; however, the cost to business will only be able to be assessed once we see how APL works with existing legislation.”



Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Employment law post-election – should we be feeling blue?

Elizabeth Marshall believes that it is starting to become clear what we can expect from the Conservative Government in terms of changes to UK employment law during this Parliament.

Paul Avis: Right product, right time?

From April 2017, applicants for Employment and Support Allowance who are assessed as unfit for work but capable of work-related activity will receive a reduced State benefit, equivalent to Jobseeker’s Allowance. The value will fall from £5,312 to £3,801 per year. Can anyone really live on this?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you