Job dissatisfaction triggers work exodus for people in their 50s

-

The pandemic-driven disruptions have not only reshaped economies and societies but have also unveiled an unexpected trend in the workforce.

A recent analysis by Phoenix Group’s longevity think tank, Phoenix Insights, sheds light on how declining job satisfaction was a critical factor driving individuals in their 50s out of the workforce, leading to a substantial rise in economic inactivity.

The research, which scrutinised annual job satisfaction data from 2009/10 to 2020/21, underscores a remarkable correlation between job satisfaction and the decision of people in their 50s to exit the workforce.

Prior to the pandemic, economic inactivity within the 50-64 age group had reached a record low of 25.2 percent, marking a steady decline since the mid-1990s.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

However, this positive trajectory took an unexpected turn during the pandemic, with economic inactivity surging to a peak of 27.7 percent in the months between May and July 2022.

Even in the post-pandemic labour market, this figure has remained considerably higher than the pre-pandemic era.

What was happening pre-pandemic?

What is more striking is the revelation that the seeds of this exodus were sown long before the pandemic hit. Those who opted to exit the workforce during their 50s exhibited declining job satisfaction in the years leading up to their departure, a phenomenon noted well before they even reached the state pension age. On the flip side, individuals who chose to continue working experienced a modest uptick in their job satisfaction levels during the same period.

A comprehensive survey conducted by Phoenix Insights involved 1,000 participants aged 50 and above, supplemented by in-depth focus group discussions. The findings underscored a prevailing sentiment among the respondents.

A staggering 59 percent of individuals in their 50s expressed the belief that older employees were being side-lined by employers. This perception likely contributed to their growing discontent. Furthermore, within the same age group, 34 percent of those who remained employed reported feeling unfulfilled by their jobs, painting a grim picture of job satisfaction among this demographic.

Early career years

The sentiments shared during the focus group discussions provided valuable context. Participants conveyed a sense of fondness for their earlier career years, highlighting a stark contrast to the progressively negative experiences they encountered in the workplace as they aged.

Remarkably, the study also found a glimmer of hope for the situation. Individuals in their early 50s displayed a higher receptiveness to improvements in workplace practices and policy interventions aimed at encouraging their continued participation in the workforce. This suggests that by addressing issues of job satisfaction and the perceived neglect of older employees, employers and policymakers could potentially reverse this unsettling trend.

The findings of this study shed light on a multifaceted issue that has broader implications for society, economy, and labour dynamics. As the workforce continues to evolve after the pandemic, understanding and addressing the factors driving this exodus is crucial to building a resilient and inclusive work environment for all age groups.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Fiona Hamor: Entering the post-furlough workplace

"But as businesses lose thousands of pounds in employee funding, what will the post-furlough landscape look like and what do employers need to consider as workers return?"

Michael Wright: Transgender considerations in recruitment

The recruitment process is a key area in which discrimination of transgender individuals is likely to occur. Below is a brief guide to the steps HR officers should be aware of to ensure an inclusive and fair recruitment processes.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you