Trevor Rutter: What should employers do about LISAs?

-

communication

The upcoming launch of the Lifetime ISA next April could impact employers more than you think. A plethora of recent surveys and reports from consultants, suppliers and industry bodies shows the likely popularity of these new savings vehicles – even greater than what the government has predicted. Indeed, over 60% of workers aged under 40 are expected to open a LISA once they become available.

The effect of LISAs on workplace pensions and other saving schemes in the reward package is inevitable: with the promise of a government bonus, greater flexibility and the potential use for buying a new home, employers must consider the likelihood of employees re-directing their savings from pensions or even opting out of them altogether. This is especially the case where employees have finite resources, so what they pay into a new product like a LISA will be a re-allocation of funds rather than an increase in overall savings.

Does this really matter? It does if employees make unwise decisions and find themselves financially worse off; responsible employers should be concerned about this. Furthermore, an exodus from employer-sponsored pension funds could affect the financial viability of these schemes, so employers have an interest in ensuring their company schemes are well supported.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

HR reward teams are well placed to support employees in considering the options and making sound decisions.  Let’s not underestimate the complexity of choices many employees will face. On the surface, the concept of a LISA is a simple one, but when employees must choose between saving into a pension or a LISA and base their decision on the interaction of national insurance and income tax rates, the benefit of either is likely to be lost.

Employers may want to consider what their communication strategy should be. This doesn’t mean giving personal advice to each employee; there are other effective approaches such as tailored messaging to different sections of the workforce, or incorporating LISAs into an existing communication platform for workplace savings.

In considering their communication strategy, it is worth employers reflecting what it is about LISAs that makes them potentially so attractive to their target market.

  • They are saving for a clear purpose that everyone can recognise the value of. It is not some nebulous concept of putting money aside for old age,
  • They are simple – you get a 25% Government bonus: a concept much easier to understand than tax relief and possibly salary sacrifice, and
  • They don’t use a 28-page explanatory booklet to get all this across. Indeed, the government sums up pretty much all you need to know in a single graphic friendly page.

 

There is much employers should learn from this when communicating about pensions. If not, the pensions options will be at a disadvantage, and making a fair comparison between the choices employees have will become even harder.

Additionally, employers may want to consider offering LISAs as part of their future reward package, given the likely popularity of these benefits. The added reassurance of employer governance and guidance would make them an even more robust and attractive savings vehicle.

Trevor Rutter is a senior consultant at employee communication specialists, Like Minds.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Samantha Hope – Attraction to qualification – ensure talent stays put

Samantha Hope is the Graduate Recruitment Manager at Shoosmiths, which is the fastest growing national law firm in the UK. She is responsible for managing the entire process of resourcing and developing trainee solicitors from initial attraction to qualification. HRreview caught up with her to discuss Shoosmith’s early careers scheme.

Lauren Clovis: Why focus on talent?

In the run up to the RPO and e-Recruitment...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you