Party leaders fall short on employee share ownership

-

General Election 2015The party manifestos lack of reference to employee share ownership is a missed opportunity say ifs ProShare, the voice of employee share ownership in the UK.

There is no mention of employee share in The Conservative Party and UKIP manifestos and The Labour Party mention they will, “…safeguard the public interest in the Royal Mail, supporting the creation of a staff-led trust for the employee share, and keeping the remaining 30 percent in public ownership.”

The Liberal Democrat manifesto states that they will encourage employers to promote employee participation and employee ownership with a specific aim to “…increase further the proportion of GDP in employee-owned businesses.”  Adding they would also “Strengthen worker participation in decision-making, including staff representation on remuneration committees, and the right for employees who collectively own 5% of a company to be represented on the board.”

While The Green Party make no specific reference to employee share ownership, they do replicate the Lib Dem policies by commissioning to give workers more of a say in the running of their companies. These include employee-elected directors in medium and larger companies and amending company law to ensure medium and large companies have employee representatives on their boards.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Phil Hall, special adviser to ifs ProShare says:

“Obviously the 10,000 plus companies offering an employee share plan and the 2.5 million employees who are participating in these schemes would probably have liked to have seen clearer commitments to employee share ownership in the various party manifestos.

“What’s more, given all mainstream political parties have previously accepted the benefits of employee share ownership – to individuals, employers and the economy as a whole – ifs ProShare would have liked a commitment to extending the benefits of employee share ownership to more companies and many more employees.

He adds:

“That said, omission from a manifesto is very different from being omitted from parties plans. We have had constructive conversations with representatives from all the main political parties over the last few months and are confident that whoever wins this election will remain committed to employee share ownership in the future.”

[poll id=”298″]

Amie Filcher is an editorial assistant at HRreview.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

David Grinham: Online proctoring: a basic guide for better results

The convenience and geographical reach of online proctored testing, together with its efficiency and cost effectiveness, is driving its adoption globally, but how do we ensure the best results?

Paul Holcroft: How will reducing low-skill foreign workers impact UK employers?

We present a piece of expert advise for employers dependent on low-skill EU labour.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you