HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Two-thirds of Brits would switch jobs for a four-day week

-

Over 20 million Brits would ditch their current job if they were offered a similar role elsewhere with a four-day working week, according to a new study on workplace benefits.  

The research, conducted by the experts at iCompario, surveyed 2,000 British workers on their current benefits, and quizzed them on the employee benefits that might tempt them to move on.

 As well as a four-day working week (68%), being able to work flexible hours (64%) and the opportunity to earn overtime pay (63%) showed up as the benefits most likely to tempt Brits away from their current employer.

 Despite the four-day working week being seen as the holy grail, it was revealed that only one in ten working Brits (10%) currently receive this benefit.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

 

What impact does the cost-of-living crisis have on this?

The cost-of-living crisis appears to be affecting how many of us view work benefits, with one in eight of those surveyed (13%) saying that they would also prefer to get food or energy bill vouchers over traditional workplace benefits like a company pension scheme or private health insurance.

 Shockingly, one in nine UK workers (11%) don’t currently receive any work benefits at all.

All in all, there are ten workplace benefits desirable enough for the majority of the UK workforce to consider moving jobs for, if they were offered a similar these alongside a similar role:

 

Benefits most likely to tempt workers away from their employer 

  1.       A four-day working week (68%) 
  2.       Flexible hours (64%) 
  3.       Overtime pay (63%) 
  4.       Remote working (56%) 
  5.       A company pension scheme (56%) 
  6.       A private healthcare plan (54%) 
  7.       Performance based bonuses (54%) 
  8.       Early finish on a Friday (54%) 
  9.       Company shares (50%) 
  10.   Employee discounts (50%) 

 

Over half of emergency service workers such as paramedics and firefighters (56%) admitted they are dissatisfied with the level of benefits they receive in their role, making them the workers most commonly unhappy with their perks at work.

 Creative workers are also among those who are most likely to be unhappy with their benefits, with those working in marketing and advertising (50%) and design/ creative roles (42%) demonstrating ‘work perk’ dissatisfaction in large numbers.

A third of those who said that they are dissatisfied with their benefits (33%) said that they would rather receive the cash value of their benefits than the perks themselves.

Workers in Belfast are the most likely to be dissatisfied with their work benefits, with over a third (36%) reporting their unhappiness. Those working in Liverpool (31%) and Newcastle (31%) are similarly unimpressed by the benefits package they receive.

Data from job board provider Adzuna reveals that across all current advertised job roles in the UK, a cycle-to-work scheme is the most frequently listed benefit – over 50,000 job adverts included this benefit in September 2022.

Company pension schemes (44,085) showed up as the next most likely benefit to be included in a UK job advert, with remote working (41,120), employee discount (40,146), and a company car/ car allowance (33,239) rounding up the top five. 

Accounting and finance employers appear to be most likely to offer a role with home working – Adzuna job adverts in this sector listed remote working as a benefit more frequently than any other.

 

Kerry Fawcett, Digital Director at iCompario said: 

“The study findings show how important a role benefits can play in retaining a happy and loyal workforce. Many workplace benefits make a tangible difference to people’s lives, and workers are much more likely to stay put in their current role if they feel that their employer is rewarding them sufficiently for their efforts.

“Our study gives some indication of the types of benefits that are most sought-after on a general basis, but employers are likely to want to conduct their own research to ensure that they are offering benefits that employees in their specific sector are looking for – getting this right can play a big part in retaining talent.”

 

Paul Lewis, Chief Customer Officer at Adzuna, comments: 

“In 2022, companies are turning to work perks to tempt talent to join them over their competition. Employees are putting more focus on health, wellbeing and work-life balance, so it’s no surprise to see a surge in jobs advertising perks like wellness programmes or getting your birthday off. Against the backdrop of a burnout epidemic and trends like quiet quitting, the best employers are providing extra flexibility and mental health support to their workforce. 

“Cycle-to-work schemes are also becoming an increasingly popular incentive. The pandemic has pushed physical health and mental wellbeing to the forefront of every business and advocating a healthy culture has become a necessity even as the pandemic recedes. 

“Cycling to work can improve overall physical fitness, prevent chronic diseases, reduce stress and anxiety and boost wellbeing. For employers, offering a cycle-to-work scheme is a simple way to show jobseekers that the company genuinely cares about their employees as individuals. It’s also a strategy to motivate workers who are used to working remotely back to the physical office. 

 “Financially speaking, it is a win-win situation for both employers and employees. Employees under the scheme pay less tax and National Insurance Contributions (NICs), while organisations can save nearly 14% on employer NICs.”  

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Peter Dando: Why ‘salary sacrifice’ needs renaming

Salary sacrifice schemes are designed to help employees make smarter financial choices - but they remain widely misunderstood.

HR hiring rises as firms respond to compliance pressure and employment law changes

HR and accounting roles see strong pay and hiring growth as businesses prepare for new employment law requirements and greater regulatory complexity.

Biscuit break or energy crash? Junk food blamed for workplace energy slumps

Poor eating habits are leaving staff tired and distracted during the working day, with many reporting dips in concentration, cravings and reduced performance.

Peter Lynch on why HR should lead technology

“Why is HR the right group to lead technology? Because we have the right mindset.”
- Advertisement -

Co-op chief executive steps down after ‘toxic culture’ claims

Senior staff concerns over fear and silence at major UK retailer coincide with a leadership exit after a turbulent year.

Lauren Webb: Leadership lessons – we rise by lifting (or training) others

The way organisations prepare new managers decides whether they grow into talent multipliers, or retreat towards helicopter parenting.

Must read

Prettpal Somel: How to tackle the #OfficeEnvy most UK employees are experiencing

"HR tends to forget the physical workplace also has an impact on performance."

Ben Black: Shared Parental Leave – One year on

True but completely unfair. Before I explain why let me set out a bit of background. The world would be a million times better – actually $12 trillion better – if we truly had equality. But equality is a long and complex journey. It doesn’t only involve recognising female talent (the best businesses already bend over backwards to help their best women fulfil their potential); it also involves changing the world so that men and women do the jobs they are best suited to rather than the ones society tells them to do.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you