Stephen Simpson on the scope of UK employment law change

-

“HR teams are right to flag unfair dismissal as a major area of change as we move closer to implementation of the Employment Rights Act.”

Context

Stephen Simpson, a principal editor at workplace law and compliance resource Brightmine, said the line in response to new data showing that many HR teams are focusing on unfair dismissal changes under the UK’s Employment Rights Act 2025 but may be underestimating other significant elements of the legislation.

The Employment Rights Act is one of the most far-reaching reforms to UK employment law in decades, with changes to compensation caps, qualifying periods and trade union rights slated to take effect over the coming year.

The quote comes amid debate within HR circles about how far the reforms will reshape employer obligations and workforce practice. The new Act, which gained Royal Assent late last year, is set to alter how unfair dismissal claims are handled and introduce other statutory protections that many organisations have not previously faced. Commentary from legal experts and employer bodies suggests that understanding the practical and operational impact of the reforms will be central to HR planning.

Simpson’s line has been picked up by HR commentators as evidence of the profession’s shifting focus from traditional policy administration to strategic evaluation of legislative risk. HR leaders and in-house counsel are debating not just how to comply with new requirements but how to prepare managers, revise handbooks and brief boards on potential legal exposure in areas such as third-party harassment liability and expanded union access.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Meaning

Simpson’s statement acknowledged that unfair dismissal changes are front of mind for many HR teams, but it also suggested that this focus may be too narrow. By saying that teams were “right to flag” one area, he recognised the instinct within the profession to prioritise immediate legal risk, while implicitly calling for attention to a broader suite of statutory shifts. The quote hinted that HR’s remit now includes legal foresight as much as compliance management.

The line also reflected the growing complexity of people practice in a changing regulatory environment. As statutory rights evolve, HR professionals must balance technical understanding of employment law with organisational readiness, communication with leadership and alignment of policy with culture. Simpson’s wording encapsulated the tension between focusing on headline changes and grappling with secondary but no less significant obligations.

The remark held broader resonance because it captured HR’s dual role: interpreting regulation and shaping how organisations respond to it. It suggested that effective HR leadership requires both tactical attention to specific risks and strategic awareness of how legal frameworks interact with workforce expectations and business objectives.

Implications

Employers may take the quote as an encouragement to broaden their review of the Employment Rights Act’s impact. Rather than concentrating solely on unfair dismissal provisions, people teams might assess how changes to union rights, statutory sick pay legislation and third-party harassment liability will affect workforce relations, contracts and workplace policies.

Workplaces may need to consider cross-functional planning, bringing legal, operations and leadership functions together to map risks and prepare guidance for managers. Simpson’s comment implied that isolating one issue could leave organisations exposed to less obvious but substantial obligations under the Act.

The statement also suggested that HR professionals should articulate these complexities clearly to boards and executive teams. By doing so, people leaders can ensure that compliance is not an afterthought but an integral part of organisational strategy as the new employment law framework unfolds.

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Automation: Is it taking the human out of HR?

While globally we have seen computerisation replace traditional jobs such as cashiers and bookkeepers - how certain are we that robots will take over our jobs?

Matt Weston: How to reach happiness in the workplace

How can companies strike the perfect balance between commercial goals and a happy, engaged workforce?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you