“This kind of change will be legislation driven.”
Context
At a recent HR event in London, one theme dominated discussion: the idea of “human quotas” — legal requirements for minimum levels of human involvement in work as artificial intelligence transforms production and decision-making.
Ania Krasniewska, group vice president at research and advisory firm Gartner, said that while many workplace revolutions have been led by corporate strategy, this one will come from above. “This kind of change won’t be organizationally driven; it will be legislation driven,” she said in an interview with news site Business Insider at the Gartner HR Symposium.
Analysts at advisory firm Gartner predicted that by 2032, at least 30 percent of the world’s top economies will introduce certified human quotas. These measures would ensure that people remain meaningfully involved in creative and operational processes even as AI systems take on more of the workload.
Meaning
Krasniewska’s comments reflect a growing recognition that, without regulatory boundaries, automation could marginalise human workers across sectors. The concept of “human in the loop” — requiring people to oversee and correct AI decisions — is already embedded in the European Union’s AI Act, which mandates human oversight for high-risk systems.
 |
Get our essential daily HR news and updates. |
She pointed to a recent Australian High Court ruling as a possible precedent. The court found that employers must consider redeploying staff before outsourcing or restructuring, a principle that could extend to how businesses balance AI and human work in future.
Implications
If governments adopt human quotas, HR departments will need robust systems to document where and how human oversight occurs. Krasniewska said businesses may have to “prove they’re doing it”, requiring new audit trails, disclosures and reporting standards.
Such regulation could increase compliance costs for firms but also reinforce the value of human judgment, especially in areas like healthcare, law and data management, where accountability is critical.
It may represent a safeguard for employees, against full automation, ensuring that human skill and intuition remain embedded in decision-making processes.
As AI integration accelerates, Krasniewska’s warning is that future workforce policy will not be left to corporate goodwill. It will be written into law.
