HSE Costs Recovery will scare employers from seeking advice

-

Nearly half of leading employers surveyed at the IOSH conference in March by business law firm, DWF, admitted to having apprehensions about the new Fee for Intervention (FFI).

The new FFI cost, which the Government recently announced will now be delayed until the autumn, will be incurred when a contravention – that is a failure to observe health and safety law requiring a formal action – is discovered during a HSE inspection or investigation. The business will continue to accrue FFI until the business has put matters right with the support of the HSE.

Steffan Groch, Head of Regulatory Litigation, at DWF said:

“Almost half of all respondents (47%) are concerned that the introduction of the Fee for Intervention will make businesses think twice before seeking advice from the HSE.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“More worrying still, a quarter weren’t aware of the HSE’s proposals, despite the obvious impacts on their businesses – a sign perhaps that the proposals have failed to be publicised sufficiently.”

Groch continued:

“While most of the nations’ leading employers are accepting of the new scheme, there is deep rooted anxiety that the high costs of FFI will have negative effects on British businesses. 49% of respondents said the £124 per hour cost of FFI is likely to negatively and disproportionately impact upon small and medium sized businesses.

“Alarmingly a third of employers we surveyed rejected the proposals all together.

“For those who are supporting the introduction of FFI, there is a desire to see that the HSE implements the scheme fairly, and the conference attendees showed widespread support for the application of a sliding cost scale, based on the size of the business, ability to pay, and the type of intervention that the HSE has to undertake.

“While we will have to wait to see what the true cost is to British businesses it appears we will be waiting in the dark as businesses are left without the well-overdue guidance they require to adequately prepare for this overhaul of the system.”

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Simon Lyle: HR professionals are set to work 22 days overtime due to redundancies

"Every ‘simple’ redundancy typically cost HR professionals 7¼ hours of work."

Dave Barker: The age of the contingent worker and how employers can create a more inclusive culture

The numbers of contingent workers is increasing rapidly.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you