Companies failed deceased worker

-

Two construction companies have been prosecuted for health and safety failures that permitted the circumstances for a fatal accident to occur on 20th August 2006 during work on a dual carriageway section of the A5036 Princess Way in Seaforth, Liverpool.

A 61-year old employee of Amey Infrastructure Services Ltd (part of the Amey Mouchel joint venture with Mouchel Parkman Services Ltd) was replacing the lights on the central reservation when the mobile elevating work platform’s arm he was using to access them collapsed, causing him to fall 8 metres. He struck the back of the vehicle and sustained injuries from which he died hours later.

Investigation found that Amey Infrastructure Services Ltd and Mouchel Parkman Services Ltd had failed to implement adequate systems for checking and maintaining the cherry picker type elevating platform, when it was first delivered or throughout the hire period. Furthermore, it needed to be repaired on several occasions while it was on hire to the companies, and had been subjected to heavy use in all weather conditions for almost a decade.

An HSE official explained that given the equipment’s heavy usage and regular repair record, it demanded that inspection and maintenance procedures be carried out thoroughly because of the great risks involved in working at height.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

At Liverpool Crown Court Amey Infrastructure Services Ltd of Oxford admitted breaching S.2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. It had failed to ensure the safety of its employees and was fined £30,000 plus £32,500 in prosecution costs.

Mouchel Parkman Services Ltd of Oxford pleaded guilty to breaching S.3(1) of the same act for failing to ensure the deceased’s safety and was fined £30,000 with costs of £32,500.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Maggie Berry : Davies review proves change is possible

In February, Lord Davies released his independent review into...

Jo Edwards: Essential planning for recruitment opportunities in 2011

Many factors, both internal and external, impact the way...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you