UK workers demand stronger alignment between company values and their own

-

A study by United Culture, a consultancy specialising in workplace culture and employee engagement, surveyed 1,500 office workers across the UK, US and Western Europe. It found that UK staff place a greater emphasis on values than peers in other countries, but also feel that those values are not reflected strongly enough in daily workplace practices.

Eight in 10 respondents across all regions said their employer’s reputation played a significant role in their decision to accept a job. In the UK, 50 percent of employees said value alignment was important, compared to a global average of 41 percent.

This focus on reputation and culture comes amid what researchers described as “a climate of economic and social uncertainty”. Alongside job security, which remains the leading priority for workers, values and transparency are increasingly used as measures of trust in an employer.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

United Culture’s managing director, Victoria Lewis-Stephens, said businesses needed to do more than publish values statements. “Reputation and values are a currency employees trade on when the world around them feels uncertain. Transparency and honesty from leaders are essential to building trust,” she said.

The UK-US gap

The findings reveal international differences. While UK employees placed a higher-than-average emphasis on values such as fairness, inclusivity and recognition, only 31 percent believed their organisation’s stated values were genuinely reflected in practice. In the United States, by contrast, nearly half (48 percent) felt their employer lived up to its stated commitments.

Elsewhere in Europe, priorities also diverged. In France, for instance, just 23 percent of respondents placed importance on inclusivity, and only 26 percent highlighted recognition, suggesting cultural differences in what employees expect from their workplace.

Asked how workplace experiences could be improved, 22 percent of respondents across all regions pointed to leadership behaviours, with another 20 percent citing clearer communication and transparency.

The study found that employees wanted honesty even in difficult circumstances. Almost half (45 percent) said open and transparent communication was the most effective way leaders could build trust, preferring “meaningful acknowledgement” to what they saw as sugar-coated reassurance.

Lewis-Stephens said employees increasingly expected authenticity from managers and executives. “People are no longer satisfied with platitudes. They expect their immediate leaders — at the very least — to be honest in a political climate in which terms like ‘post-truth’ are being bandied around,” she said.

HR strategies

Analysts say the findings present challenges for HR leaders seeking to embed values into the employee experience. While reputation may influence initial recruitment decisions, retention depends on whether staff feel those values are evident in daily working life.

This disconnect between stated and lived values can weaken trust and affect engagement, said observers. The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development has previously urged employers to integrate values into leadership behaviours, communications and reward systems rather than treating them as standalone statements.

The research also suggests that transparency brings measurable benefits. A quarter (26 percent) of respondents said they did their best work when leaders communicated openly and frequently. HR experts argue that embedding such behaviours into management training could deliver productivity gains as well as stronger engagement.

A question of culture

United Culture’s study adds to a growing body of research linking organisational culture to business outcomes. Recent surveys by Deloitte and PwC have shown that culture and reputation are now among the top factors influencing job choice for younger workers in particular, including Generation Z.

The findings also reflect wider employee expectations around corporate responsibility. With public trust in institutions under strain, employees are increasingly looking to their employers to demonstrate integrity and social awareness.

For HR teams, this means addressing gaps between espoused values and lived experience, including reviewing policies, listening to employee feedback and ensuring leaders are accountable for modelling desired behaviours.

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Connie Barrow: Are you giving candidate screening the attention it deserves?

I recently read an article published on the Telegraph’s...

Paul Avis: Right product, right time?

From April 2017, applicants for Employment and Support Allowance who are assessed as unfit for work but capable of work-related activity will receive a reduced State benefit, equivalent to Jobseeker’s Allowance. The value will fall from £5,312 to £3,801 per year. Can anyone really live on this?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you