Hidden Figures: CIPD research shows important people data is missing from corporate reports

-

New research from the CIPD, the professional body for HR and people development, highlights that many FTSE 100 firms are failing to share important workforce data in their annual reports. In response, the CIPD is calling for improved reporting and transparency from Britain’s biggest businesses, warning that failure to capture and disclose key workforce data is keeping investors, employees and other parties in the dark on key business indicators.

The CIPD’s research looks at how workforce reporting has changed over the last five years and explores how transparent organisations are being about risks and opportunities relating to the workforce. The report, Hidden Figures: How workforce data is missing from corporate reports, found:

  • The big picture: Workforce reporting in FTSE 100 organisations’ annual reports increased by 9% between 2015 and 2017, a much smaller increase compared to the 19% increase seen between 2013 and 2016 when the CIPD first analysed FTSE 100 workforce reporting.
  • Regularly reported: The most commonly reported workforce issues were talent management, succession planning and employee turnover.
  • Skills reporting in short supply: Only 12% of FTSE 100 firms reported their perspectives on skills shortages and only 21% reported on skills gaps, despite many businesses expressing concern about access to skills after the UK leaves the European Union in 2019.
  • Going up… Apprenticeships (64% more reporting), employee well-being (+76%), entrepreneurship (+28%), talent management (+26%) all saw increased levels of reporting between 2015 and 2017.
  • Going Down… Internships (32% less reporting), commitment (-31%), flexibility (-30%) and employee engagement (-21%) all saw decreased levels of reporting between 2015 and 2017.

 

Edward Houghton, senior research adviser for Human Capital and Governance at the CIPD, said:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It’s positive to see that the quantity of workforce reporting is increasing, but there’s still a considerable challenge regarding the quality, consistency and transparency of data being reported. Organisations seem to focus their efforts on complying with legislation and governance codes and report on very little else voluntarily. Reporting is also often subject to trends or pressure from government rather than ongoing strategic imperatives. We need to see much more consistency in what is being reported, the language used to report it and the measurements being applied so all stakeholders get a complete picture of workforce opportunities and risks.”

“Without full transparency there’s a real danger that businesses are painting an overly positive picture of how they manage their people and people risk. Gender pay gap reporting regulations have shown us that a framework and a common language can improve disclosure and prompt healthy debate on important issues among key stakeholders. It’s also rightly awakened an appetite among investors for even more workforce data. Businesses need to be ready to respond to this demand. We need senior leaders to get comfortable with being more transparent about their workforce practices and we need investors and government to be demanding far more of these insights.”

To support a better understanding of workforce issues and risks, the CIPD has created a new reporting framework which, alongside improved use of workforce analytics, aims to improve transparency and help with the identification and management of workforce and cultural risks.

The CIPD’s People Risk Reporting Framework explores seven dimensions of workforce risk that employers should look to report against: talent management, health and safety, employee ethics, diversity and equality, employee relations, business continuity and reputational risk. It integrates best practice elements of FTSE 100 firms’ risk management frameworks into a single model, but allows for flexibility within each of the seven dimensions based on what is most appropriate for each organisation.

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Carole Gaskell: Find YOUR Sergeant McKenzie like Kris Akabusi did

Kris Akabusi is a former sprint and hurdling track...

Simon Lyle: HR professionals are set to work 22 days overtime due to redundancies

"Every ‘simple’ redundancy typically cost HR professionals 7¼ hours of work."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you