Flexible working to avoid rush hour labelled “nonsensical”

-

The Forum of Private Business has branded a suggestion by a Government Minister that workers should be allowed to ask for flexible working to avoid rush hour congestion as “nonsensical.”

The lobby group’s Head of Policy, Alex Jackman, said that small businesses should not have administrative complexities thrust upon them because of poorly maintained, congested roads and a rail network that is bursting at the seams.

He added:

“The notion workers should be allowed to pick and choose their hours because of successive Governments’ failure to deliver credible improvements to the country’s transport infrastructure is ridiculous.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Earlier this week, Business Minister, Jo Swinson, told a House of Commons Business Committee on women’s workplace rights that employees should be able to request the right to come into work earlier or later to avoid peak time travel.

In 2014, all staff members with at least six months’ service will be able to request flexible working, and Swinson advocated this be extended to allow staff to use it to avoid the rush hour.

Jackman went onto say:

“If flexible working works for businesses they will do it themselves. What they don’t need is unworkable suggestions from ministers made on the hoof.

“Just imagine what this would mean on the ground for most businesses: longer opening hours would mean higher office running costs – will the Government pay for the increase in energy bills?

“Then there’s key holder responsibility issues, monitoring time keeping would be a job in itself, and crucial to any business is the ability of employees to communicate with ease and consistency. Wildly different working hours would also make business-to-business communication much more difficult.”

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Apprentices driving loyalty and growing businesses, survey finds.

The government has this week released the findings of...

Deborah Lewis: The art of communication

It’s because a picture can paint a thousand words,...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you