Flexible working to avoid rush hour labelled “nonsensical”

-

The Forum of Private Business has branded a suggestion by a Government Minister that workers should be allowed to ask for flexible working to avoid rush hour congestion as “nonsensical.”

The lobby group’s Head of Policy, Alex Jackman, said that small businesses should not have administrative complexities thrust upon them because of poorly maintained, congested roads and a rail network that is bursting at the seams.

He added:

“The notion workers should be allowed to pick and choose their hours because of successive Governments’ failure to deliver credible improvements to the country’s transport infrastructure is ridiculous.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Earlier this week, Business Minister, Jo Swinson, told a House of Commons Business Committee on women’s workplace rights that employees should be able to request the right to come into work earlier or later to avoid peak time travel.

In 2014, all staff members with at least six months’ service will be able to request flexible working, and Swinson advocated this be extended to allow staff to use it to avoid the rush hour.

Jackman went onto say:

“If flexible working works for businesses they will do it themselves. What they don’t need is unworkable suggestions from ministers made on the hoof.

“Just imagine what this would mean on the ground for most businesses: longer opening hours would mean higher office running costs – will the Government pay for the increase in energy bills?

“Then there’s key holder responsibility issues, monitoring time keeping would be a job in itself, and crucial to any business is the ability of employees to communicate with ease and consistency. Wildly different working hours would also make business-to-business communication much more difficult.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Geoff Webb: How small AI use cases, turn into big workplace improvements

So many already feel disengaged and burned out, and yet HR teams are buried in the day-to-day minutia of answering questions and dealing with today’s fire drill.

Sandra Porter: Has HR forgotten to put its own oxygen mask on first?

The HR profession is on the brink of well-deserved greatness, writes Sandra Porter.  From the Covid-19 cloud there is the potential silver lining of a permanent seat in organisations’ ‘war rooms’.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you