Employers are misjudging the possibility of a severe issue affecting their staff

-

Employers are misjudging the possibility of a severe issue affecting their staff

Employers seem to be misjudging the chance of a severe issue such as an illness or bereavement affecting their staff within the next 12 months.

According to Group Risk Development (GRiD), the industry body for the group risk protection sector has shown a disparity in HR professionals views and reality. Even though just under 80 per cent (78 per cent) of individuals working in HR for large companies having already supported a staff member in their current role going through bereavement, only 65 per cent predict they will have to do this again in the upcoming 12 months.

This miscalculation also extends to employees being absent for a long period of time. HR professionals who have experience dealing with employees being absent for six months or over lie at 76 per cent, only 60 per cent believe it will happen again in the next 12 months.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Irrespective of a HR professional experiencing such issues with an employee, the likelihood of it happening is high enough. According to Macmillan Cancer Support 125,000 people of working age will be diagnosed with cancer every year. Mind, the mental health charity predicts 1 in 4 people will endure a mental health problem and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that 16 per cent of people who died in 2017 were of working age.

Katharine Moxham, spokesperson for GRiD said:

Statistics clearly show the likelihood of employees being affected by serious issues. Furthermore, employers need to realise that just because they’ve dealt with a serious incident with one employee, it unfortunately does not mean that they are in some way immune from it happening again. Indeed, larger organisations, and those with a specific demographic bias, may find themselves repeatedly dealing with a similar scenario for individuals within their workforce.

GRiD also highlighted that these scenarios are interlinked as a serious illness can lead to death and then possibly a mental health issue.

Ms Moxham added:

Of course true support for employees needs to go beyond that individual member of staff and extend to their family too. These serious issues have a wide impact on partners and dependents, and the individual member of staff will only be fully supported and get true peace of mind if they know their family is looked after as well.

She also believes that group risk products can provide an answer to such problems as they can offer financial and wellbeing support for employees and their families.

Interested in employee wellbeing? We recommend the Workplace Wellbeing and Stress Forum 2019

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Marcus Thornley: How to make sure recruits feel welcome when onboarding remotely

"Employees can’t hit the ground running if they’re nervous and anxious, so the ideal onboarding process will support the confidence of a new joiner."

Nick Gallimore: Rethinking pay and reward in the hybrid model

"Employees will want to transparency around the new policies you intend to put in place, especially how these changes could affect pay and reward."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you