‘Barriers to flexibility remain’ one year on from flexible working legislation

-

Despite legal entitlement to make such a request from day one of employment, almost one in three workers (28%) say their application has been denied due to concerns about productivity.

The findings come from Phoenix Group, one of the UK’s largest long-term savings and retirement businesses. The data shows that although conversations around flexible working are increasing, progress remains inconsistent. While 21 percent of workers successfully applied to work flexibly in the past year, an equal proportion had their requests refused by either current or previous employers.

The primary reason for refusal is a perceived loss of productivity, but the report reveals a mismatch between employer concerns and employee expectations. While 68 percent of workers believe they would be more efficient with control over their hours and location, employers remain hesitant to shift away from traditional models of working.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In many cases, flexible working is misunderstood or inconsistently applied. Although the legislation aimed to standardise access, there are still challenges in terms of awareness, manager engagement and workplace culture.

Productivity concerns driving refusal of flexible requests

The research identified multiple reasons why requests for flexible working are still being declined. Alongside concerns about productivity, 27 percent of employees say their employer simply does not support the idea of flexibility. In 24 percent of cases “business needs” were behind the refusal, while 21 percent pointed to a lack of resources to implement flexible models.

When asked what flexibility would mean in practice, 62 percent of workers said they wanted flexibility over the hours they work, and 43 percent prioritised flexibility in terms of location. The data suggests that for most, flexibility is about gaining greater control over when and where work happens, rather than reducing hours.

Despite the introduction of the Flexible Working Act, the majority of workers have not changed their working patterns. Only 15 percent reported making any changes since the law came into effect, and 78 percent said they are continuing under existing arrangements.

Among those who did change their working style, the most common shift was moving to full-time work with the option to work remotely (57%). Men were more likely than women to have made this change, with 65 percent of men reporting the adjustment compared to 45 percent of women.

Lack of awareness limits uptake

The research also noted a widespread lack of awareness around the new legislation. More than half of workers (55%) do not know what the Flexible Working Act entitles them to. In addition, 36 percent say their employer or manager has never raised the topic or offered any information.

Sara Thompson, Chief People Officer at Phoenix Group, said that these barriers are “disappointing.”

“The introduction of the Flexible Working Act is an important tool to help workers balance their jobs with other responsibilities and interests outside of work. It’s therefore disappointing that many are facing barriers with some employers worried about how flexibility could impact on a worker’s productivity,” she said.

“As the demand for flexibility grows, it is in employers’ best interests to engage proactively with their workforce and, where possible, to enable their workers to work in a flexible way, alongside managing business needs. Those businesses that fail to embrace flexible working risk losing talent, particularly among parents, carers and older workers who can benefit most from greater flexibility.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Office Drama: When does HR need to step in?

The reality is that disagreements that arise in the workplace are often between highly competent individuals and the consequences can have a far reaching impact on the business as well as the mental health of those involved.

What is garden leave and when is it right for SMEs?

Garden leave is paid leave for an employee who is leaving your business to work for a competitor. But how do you know whether it’s appropriate, or affordable, for you to place an employee on garden leave?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you