The Ministry of Defence splash out on recruitment advertising

-

The Ministry of Defence has spent £9 million on recruitment advertising for the armed forces despite being in the process of laying off thousands of troops over the next four years.

According to figures revealed in a written Parliamentary answer to shadow defence minister Kevan Jones, the government department has forked out £5.19 million in adverts for the army, £2.2 million for the Royal Navy and £1.85 million for the RAF.

The move comes only weeks after nearly 2,000 armed forces personnel out of a projected 22,000 were issued with redundancy notices.

Junior defence minister Andrew Robathan told MPs that the money was spent on TV and newspaper adverts in order to try and attract new recruits required to replace troops taking retirement and/or both voluntary and compulsory redundancy.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

He added: “It is a key requirement for each of the armed forces to maintain a satisfactory balance of skills, experience, ability and seniority in rank to enable delivery of operational requirements. Despite the reduction in overall numbers of service personnel, and the associated need for a redundancy programme, the armed forces must still recruit and train personnel to replace those who leave the services at the end of their current engagements.”

Recruitment activity was particularly important to find staff with specialist qualifications or experience for (unspecified) difficult-to-fill posts, he added.

The news came as the Telegraph revealed that the MoD has put out a tender for a £1 billion outsourcing deal. The arrangement will see recruitment to the army being hived off to private sector contractors for 10 years.

Under the Recruiting Partnering Project, the winning bidder would be expected to recruit 7,500 officers and men each year, effectively costing taxpayers £14,000 per soldier. The decision has been described as “perverse” by serving officers who have already been forced to sack 1,000 soldiers this year.

But officials at Army Land Command in Wiltshire attested that the arrangement would save £250 million over the next decade by removing the need for well-paid senior officers to undertake such backroom tasks as data entry.

It is understand that the RAF and Royal Navy will go down a similar route.

Read more: http://www.hrzone.co.uk/topic/strategies/mod-spends-9m-armed-forces-recruitment-redundancies-mount/114789#ixzz1b3XEivzH

Latest news

Calls grow for working from home as fuel shortages loom amid Iran conflict

Remote work is being urged as fuel shortages linked to Middle East conflict threaten commuting, business operations and workforce stability.

Worker denied leave for 25 years wins £400,000 in holiday pay case

A tribunal awards nearly £400,000 to a worker denied annual leave for decades, raising concerns about holiday policies and employer compliance.

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.
- Advertisement -

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.

Must read

Khyati Sundaram: What is the ‘AI sigh’, and what can HR leaders do about it?

You know there’s a problem when you’re faced with dozens of identical applications, and we all know the culprit. Cue the “AI sigh”.

Rebecca Hughes: Weaponising AI – how can employers respond?

An emerging trend that we are observing is that employees are using AI to raise formal workplace grievances and in litigating their claims.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you