HRreview Header

Nine in 10 employers ‘find discrepancies during candidate screening’

-

That’s according to new research from global background screening provider HireRight. The organisation’s 18th annual Global Benchmark Report found that 90 percent of businesses in the EMEA region had discovered inconsistencies during pre-employment screening.

The survey, based on responses from over 1,000 HR, risk and talent acquisition professionals globally, shows that the most common discrepancies were found in employment history (64%) and education records (47%). In addition, 22 percent of employers uncovered unreported criminal convictions through background checks.

The findings come amid growing concern over identity fraud and the increasing use of AI by candidates in job applications. Despite this, many employers are yet to implement robust identity verification processes or develop clear strategies for the use of AI in recruitment.

Identity fraud on the rise but checks remain patchy

The report notes the continuing threat of identity fraud, with nearly one in five EMEA businesses (19%) having already experienced it. An additional 19 percent said they were unsure whether they had been affected, raising questions over detection capability.

Despite the financial and reputational risks, many companies still do not routinely carry out identity verification as part of their pre-employment screening. According to fraud prevention organisation Cifas, identity fraud costs the UK an estimated £1.8 billion per year, with more than 237,000 cases reported in 2023. Early indicators from Cifas suggest that fraud levels are continuing to increase.

Peter Cleverton, EVP of International at HireRight, said, “With nine out of 10 businesses in EMEA identifying discrepancies during the candidate screening process, it’s clear that the challenges facing employers are intensifying – particularly as both identity fraud and AI-assisted job applications become more prevalent.”

Uncertainty around AI in recruitment

Despite widespread industry attention, many HR professionals remain uncertain about the role of AI in their processes. Globally, almost half of respondents said they were unsure whether AI tools would be adopted for core HR functions during 2025. In EMEA, just 36 percent of organisations said they plan to start or continue using AI in HR this year, while 33 percent remain undecided and 31 percent say they will not use AI tools.

Among those already using AI, the most common applications include candidate selection and CV filtering, onboarding processes and employee training. These same areas are also the top focus for companies planning to introduce AI in the near future.

However, only a small proportion of employers feel confident in detecting AI-generated content in job applications. Just 4 percent of EMEA respondents said they were very confident in identifying when AI tools had been used by candidates, while 29 percent said they had little or no confidence.

Mixed views on AI-generated applications

Employer sentiment around the use of AI by candidates is still evolving. When asked how they feel about AI-assisted applications, 72 percent of EMEA-based HR professionals said they were neutral or unsure. The remaining respondents were equally split between viewing it positively – as a way to identify well-matched candidates more efficiently – and negatively, due to concerns about the potential for misrepresentation.

This uncertainty is prompting calls for more structured approaches to the integration of AI in both recruitment and candidate screening.

Cleverton added, “Our latest Global Benchmark Report highlights the urgent need for organisations to review their screening processes and packages to thoughtfully evaluate how AI is used in both hiring practices and candidate applications. As the landscape evolves, trust, transparency and vigilance will be key to building effective and secure workforces.”

Latest news

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.

Managers’ biggest fears? ‘Confrontation and redundancies’

Survey of UK managers reveals fear of confrontation and redundancies, with many lacking training to handle difficult workplace situations.
- Advertisement -

Mike Bond: Redefining talent – and prioritising the creative mindset

Not too long ago, the most prized CVs boasted MBAs, consulting pedigrees and an impressive record of traditional experience. Now, things are different.

UK loses ground in global remote work rankings

Connectivity gaps across the UK risk weakening the country’s appeal to remote workers and internationally mobile talent.

Must read

Richard Lister: How employers in European jurisdictions should deal with workplace sexual harassment

Legal experts from the leading global HR and employment law firm alliance, Ius Laboris explain the legal position on sexual harassment at work in five European countries and best practice for employers

Rachel Arkle: Is wellbeing the one thing holding women back?

For over a decade, we’ve seen a drive for gender balance in the workplace, with leadership in particular under the spotlight. Despite considerable effort and investment, many remark, that progress (even at Google) is glacial, with economists extending their prediction for gender equality until 2186.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you